Titan X Pascal: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
Titan X Pascal provides good gaming and benchmark performance at 30.75% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 5090 D.
Contents
Summary
NVIDIA started Titan X Pascal sales 2 August 2016 at a recommended price of $1,199. This is a desktop graphics card based on a Pascal architecture and made with 16 nm manufacturing process. It is primarily aimed at gamer market. 12 GB of GDDR5X memory clocked at 1.25 GHz are supplied, and together with 384 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 480.4 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is a dual-slot graphics card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 267 mm. One 6-pin and one 8-pin connectors are required, and power consumption is at 250 Watt.
Primary details
Some basic facts about Titan X Pascal: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in the ranking | 190 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.00 | |
| Power efficiency | 9.38 | of 100.00 (Radeon 890M) |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | |
| GPU code name | GP102 | |
| Market segment | Desktop | |
| Release date | 2 August 2016 (8 years ago) | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | of 14,999 (Quadro Plex 7000) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Titan X Pascal's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Titan X Pascal's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 | of 24064 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell) |
| Core clock speed | 1417 MHz | of 2670 MHz (Arc B580) |
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | of 3230 MHz (Radeon RX 9060 XT) |
| Number of transistors | 11,800 million | of 185,000 million (Radeon Instinct MI350X) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | of 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | of 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
| Texture fill rate | 342.9 | of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
| Floating-point processing power | 10.97 TFLOPS | of 126 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell) |
| ROPs | 96 | of 512 (Moore Threads MTT S4000) |
| TMUs | 224 | of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
Form factor & compatibility
This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Titan X Pascal and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of memory installed on Titan X Pascal: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | GDDR5X | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | of 288 GB (Radeon Instinct MI325X) |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | of 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 1251 MHz | of 16000 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) |
| Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB/s | of 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
| Shared memory | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on Titan X Pascal. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
| HDMI | + | |
| G-SYNC support | + |
API and SDK compatibility
APIs supported by Titan X Pascal, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | + | |
| CUDA | + |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Titan X Pascal. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.
SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
SPECviewperf 12 - Energy
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
Unigine Heaven 4.0
This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark, a newer version of Unigine 3.0 with relatively small differences. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. The benchmark is still sometimes used, despite its significant age, as it was released back in 2013.
SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max
This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.
Send your test results of Titan X Pascal.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good Titan X Pascal is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 124 | |
| 1440p | 74 | |
| 4K | 58 |
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 9.67 | |
| 1440p | 16.20 | |
| 4K | 20.67 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 337 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 83 | |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 126 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 153 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 291 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 74 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 162 | |
| Fortnite | 210 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 127 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 119 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 113 | |
| Valorant | 296 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 147 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 205 | |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 65 | |
| Dota 2 | 252 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 149 | |
| Fortnite | 199 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 121 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 106 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 160 | |
| Metro Exodus | 96 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 113 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 184 | |
| Valorant | 275 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 137 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 57 | |
| Dota 2 | 232 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 140 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 112 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 102 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 95 | |
| Valorant | 181 |
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 170 |
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 111 | |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 103 | |
| Metro Exodus | 58 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180 | |
| Valorant | 258 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 80−85 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 37 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 101 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 85−90 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 80−85 |
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 99 | |
| Metro Exodus | 36 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 68 | |
| Valorant | 257 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 71 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 17 | |
| Dota 2 | 160 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 53 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 73 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 44 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 60 |
AMD equivalent
According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Titan X Pascal is Radeon RX Vega 56, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our ranking.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Titan X Pascal:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Titan X Pascal according to our statistics.
