To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal: specs and benchmarks
Price now
1000$
Games supported
98%
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1418
- Max video memory 12 GB
- Memory type GDDR5X
- Memory clock speed 10000
- Maximum resolution
Year of release
2016
Performance
44.57
Summary
NVIDIA started Titan X Pascal sales 25 July 2016 at a recommended price of $1,199. This is Pascal architecture desktop card based on 16 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. 12 GB of GDDR5X memory clocked at 10 GHz are supplied, and together with 384 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 480.4 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is dual-slot card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 267 mm. One 6-pin and one 8-pin connectors are required, and power consumption is at 250 Watt.
It provides good gaming and benchmark performance at
44.57%
of a leader's which is AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT.
General info
Of Titan X Pascal's architecture, market segment and release date.
| Place in performance rating | 94 | |
| Value for money | 18.47 | |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | |
| GPU code name | GP102 | |
| Market segment | Desktop | |
| Release date | 25 July 2016 (5 years ago) | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
| Price now | $1000 (0.8x MSRP) | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Value for money
Technical specs
Titan X Pascal's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Titan X Pascal's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 | of 18432 (AD102) |
| Core clock speed | 1418 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | of 2903 (Radeon Pro W6600) |
| Number of transistors | 11,800 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | of 4 (H100 PCIe) |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 Watt | of 900 (Tesla S2050) |
| Texture fill rate | 342.9 | of 939.8 (H100 SXM5) |
| Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Titan X Pascal's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Titan X Pascal: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5X | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | of 19500 (GeForce RTX 3090) |
| Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB/s | of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
| Shared memory | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Titan X Pascal. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
| HDMI | + | |
| G-SYNC support | + |
API support
APIs supported by Titan X Pascal, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | + | |
| CUDA | + |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of Titan X Pascal. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
- SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
- SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
- SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
- SPECviewperf 12 - Energy
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
- SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
- SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max
- Unigine Heaven 4.0
- Passmark
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01
SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
SPECviewperf 12 - Energy
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max
This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.
Unigine Heaven 4.0
This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark, a newer version of Unigine 3.0 with relatively small differences. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. The benchmark is still sometimes used, despite its significant age, as it was released back in 2013.
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Titan X Pascal. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.98 kh/s |
Game benchmarks
Let's see how good Titan X Pascal is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 129 | |
| 1440p | 83 | |
| 4K | 67 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 104 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 95 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 153 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 155 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 72 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 88 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 103 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 127 | |
| Hitman 3 | 163 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 107 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 104 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 112 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 104 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 87 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 85 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 147 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 123 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 60 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 84 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 99 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 121 | |
| Hitman 3 | 143 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 84 | |
| Metro Exodus | 84 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 58 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 106 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 160 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 91 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 67 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 63 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 137 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 51 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 80 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 90 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 112 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 90 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 64 |
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 84 | |
| Hitman 3 | 87 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 60 | |
| Metro Exodus | 54 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 37 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 45−50 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 51 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 34 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 84 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 46 |
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 49 | |
| Hitman 3 | 47 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 34 | |
| Metro Exodus | 35 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 43 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 68 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 38 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 32 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 71 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 53 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 56 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 73 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 26 |
Relative perfomance
Overall Titan X Pascal performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.
AMD equivalent
The nearest Titan X Pascal's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX Vega 56, which is faster by 5% and higher by 6 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Titan X Pascal:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Titan X Pascal according to our statistics.
4.6%
3.1%
3.1%
3.1%
3.1%
3.1%
3.1%
3.1%
3.1%
