ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking198not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.99no data
Power efficiency9.57no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGP102R300
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 August 2016 (9 years ago)22 January 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1417 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate342.92.600
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPSno data
ROPs968
TMUs2248
L1 Cache1.3 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XDDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s19.84 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x S-Video
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 August 2016 22 January 2003
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 150 nm

Titan X Pascal has an age advantage of 13 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Titan X Pascal and All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO
All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3008 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.