Radeon RX Vega 56 vs Titan X Pascal

Place in the ranking	157	152
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.95	24.15
Power efficiency	9.33	11.23
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	GP102	Vega 10
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 August 2016 (8 years ago)	14 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 56 has 247% better value for money than Titan X Pascal.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	3584
Core clock speed	1417 MHz	1156 MHz
Boost clock speed	1531 MHz	1471 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	210 Watt
Texture fill rate	342.9	329.5
Floating-point processing power	10.97 TFLOPS	10.54 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	64
TMUs	224	224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	1251 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	480.4 GB/s	409.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.1.125
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Titan X Pascal 33.88

RX Vega 56 34.26
+1.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026

RX Vega 56 13175
+1.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Titan X Pascal 35981
+23.7%

RX Vega 56 29086

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Titan X Pascal 100948
+84.9%

RX Vega 56 54586

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Titan X Pascal 27349
+31.7%

RX Vega 56 20759

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Titan X Pascal 136891
+9.2%

RX Vega 56 125359

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Titan X Pascal 514513
+24.6%

RX Vega 56 412820

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Titan X Pascal 92

RX Vega 56 141
+53.5%

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Titan X Pascal 152
+4.9%

RX Vega 56 145

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	126 +9.6%	115 −9.6%
1440p	74 +0%	74 +0%
4K	58 +20.8%	48 −20.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	9.52 −174%	3.47 +174%
1440p	16.20 −201%	5.39 +201%
4K	20.67 −149%	8.31 +149%

RX Vega 56 has 174% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX Vega 56 has 201% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX Vega 56 has 149% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	92 +33.3%	65−70 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 +9.7%	70−75 −9.7%
Elden Ring	116 −1.7%	110−120 +1.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	72 −22.2%	88 +22.2%
Counter-Strike 2	74 +7.2%	65−70 −7.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	75 +4.2%	70−75 −4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	251 +55.9%	160−170 −55.9%
Metro Exodus	150 +56.3%	96 −56.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	125 +81.2%	65−70 −81.2%
Valorant	212 +54.7%	130−140 −54.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	168 +7.7%	156 −7.7%
Counter-Strike 2	63 −9.5%	65−70 +9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	65 −10.8%	70−75 +10.8%
Dota 2	191 +203%	63 −203%
Elden Ring	145 +22.9%	110−120 −22.9%
Far Cry 5	146 +60.4%	90−95 −60.4%
Fortnite	150−160 +10.7%	140 −10.7%
Forza Horizon 4	194 +20.5%	160−170 −20.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	160 +70.2%	94 −70.2%
Metro Exodus	106 +45.2%	73 −45.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	250 +32.3%	180−190 −32.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	58 −19%	65−70 +19%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −1.7%	110−120 +1.7%
Valorant	117 −17.1%	130−140 +17.1%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	64 −25%	80 +25%
Counter-Strike 2	55 −25.5%	65−70 +25.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	55 −30.9%	70−75 +30.9%
Dota 2	232 +109%	110−120 −109%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −1.1%	90−95 +1.1%
Forza Horizon 4	167 +3.7%	160−170 −3.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	146 +30.4%	112 −30.4%
Valorant	181 +32.1%	130−140 −32.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	103 +66.1%	60−65 −66.1%
Elden Ring	84 +25.4%	65−70 −25.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	103 +66.1%	60−65 −66.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	37 +12.1%	30−35 −12.1%
World of Tanks	210−220 −0.9%	210−220 +0.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −3.1%	67 +3.1%
Counter-Strike 2	34 +6.3%	30−35 −6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 +9.1%	30−35 −9.1%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −1.9%	100−110 +1.9%
Forza Horizon 4	122 +27.1%	95−100 −27.1%
Metro Exodus	101 +36.5%	74 −36.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −1.8%	55−60 +1.8%
Valorant	110 +7.8%	100−110 −7.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Dota 2	99 +98%	50 −98%
Elden Ring	44 +41.9%	30−35 −41.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	99 +98%	50 −98%
Metro Exodus	36 +33.3%	27 −33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	114 +4.6%	100−110 −4.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24 +9.1%	21−24 −9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	99 +98%	50 −98%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	53 +51.4%	35 −51.4%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Dota 2	160 +146%	65−70 −146%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −2.1%	45−50 +2.1%
Fortnite	67 +45.7%	45−50 −45.7%
Forza Horizon 4	70 +27.3%	55−60 −27.3%
Valorant	58 +11.5%	50−55 −11.5%

This is how Titan X Pascal and RX Vega 56 compete in popular games:

Titan X Pascal is 10% faster in 1080p
A tie in 1440p
Titan X Pascal is 21% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Titan X Pascal is 203% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 56 is 31% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Titan X Pascal is ahead in 43 tests (68%)
RX Vega 56 is ahead in 16 tests (25%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.88	34.26
Recency	2 August 2016	14 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	210 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX Vega 56, on the other hand, has a 1.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 19% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Titan X Pascal and Radeon RX Vega 56.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.