GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Titan X Pascal
2016
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
32.58
+17.2%

Titan X Pascal outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking171209
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.70100.00
Power efficiency9.2224.58
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1393% better value for money than Titan X Pascal.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841536
Core clock speed1417 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate342.9152.6
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs22496

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 32.58
+17.2%
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 27.79

  • Other tests
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
    • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
    • SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
    • SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Titan X Pascal 35981
+78.8%
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 20119

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Titan X Pascal 100948
+105%
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 49309

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Titan X Pascal 27349
+84.6%
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 14818

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Titan X Pascal 136891
+40.4%
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 97517

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Titan X Pascal 514513
+22.6%
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 419800

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Titan X Pascal 132
+77%
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 74

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Titan X Pascal 152
+3.7%
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 147

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124
+40.9%
88
−40.9%
1440p74
+27.6%
58
−27.6%
4K58
+65.7%
35
−65.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.67
−272%
2.60
+272%
1440p16.20
−310%
3.95
+310%
4K20.67
−216%
6.54
+216%
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 272% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 310% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 216% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 337
+129%
147
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
−3.6%
86
+3.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 119
+60.8%
74
−60.8%
Battlefield 5 153
+37.8%
111
−37.8%
Counter-Strike 2 291
+119%
133
−119%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+8.8%
68
−8.8%
Far Cry 5 162
+74.2%
93
−74.2%
Fortnite 210
+62.8%
120−130
−62.8%
Forza Horizon 4 127
−5.5%
134
+5.5%
Forza Horizon 5 119
+19%
100
−19%
Hogwarts Legacy 90
+45.2%
62
−45.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+5.6%
100−110
−5.6%
Valorant 296
+41.6%
209
−41.6%
Battlefield 5 147
+42.7%
103
−42.7%
Counter-Strike 2 205
+103%
101
−103%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+3.4%
260−270
−3.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
+20.4%
54
−20.4%
Dota 2 252
+108%
121
−108%
Far Cry 5 149
+67.4%
89
−67.4%
Fortnite 199
+54.3%
120−130
−54.3%
Forza Horizon 4 121
−3.3%
125
+3.3%
Forza Horizon 5 106
+17.8%
90
−17.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 160
+52.4%
105
−52.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 72
+50%
48
−50%
Metro Exodus 96
+77.8%
54
−77.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+5.6%
100−110
−5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+78.6%
103
−78.6%
Valorant 275
+32.9%
207
−32.9%
Battlefield 5 137
+45.7%
94
−45.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+9.6%
52
−9.6%
Dota 2 232
+100%
116
−100%
Far Cry 5 140
+68.7%
83
−68.7%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+13.1%
99
−13.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 55
+57.1%
35
−57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
−6.9%
109
+6.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+72.7%
55
−72.7%
Valorant 181
+44.8%
125
−44.8%
Fortnite 170
+58.9%
107
−58.9%
Counter-Strike 2 111
+79%
60−65
−79%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+15.9%
180−190
−15.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+102%
50−55
−102%
Metro Exodus 58
+93.3%
30
−93.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 258
+31%
197
−31%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+21.7%
69
−21.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+48%
25
−48%
Far Cry 5 101
+68.3%
60
−68.3%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+21.1%
70−75
−21.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+21.7%
45−50
−21.7%
Fortnite 80−85
+15.9%
69
−15.9%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+25%
27−30
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 99
+90.4%
50−55
−90.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Metro Exodus 36
+89.5%
19
−89.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+94.3%
35
−94.3%
Valorant 257
+69.1%
152
−69.1%
Battlefield 5 71
+86.8%
38
−86.8%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+25%
27−30
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+70%
10
−70%
Dota 2 160
+88.2%
85
−88.2%
Far Cry 5 53
+71%
31
−71%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+52.1%
45−50
−52.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
+29.4%
16−18
−29.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Fortnite 60
+93.5%
30−35
−93.5%

This is how Titan X Pascal and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Titan X Pascal is 41% faster in 1080p
  • Titan X Pascal is 28% faster in 1440p
  • Titan X Pascal is 66% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Titan X Pascal is 129% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 7% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Titan X Pascal is ahead in 61 test (92%)
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.58 27.79
Recency 2 August 2016 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 17.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

The Titan X Pascal is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6
3001 vote

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
1640 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.