Arc Pro B60 vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal with Arc Pro B60, including specs and performance data.

Titan X Pascal
2016
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
29.46

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking199197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.7532.79
Power efficiency9.5011.92
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameGP102BMG-G21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 August 2016 (9 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Arc Pro B60 has 470% better value for money than Titan X Pascal.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842560
Core clock speed1417 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate342.9384.0
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs224160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache1.3 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length267 mm167 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s456.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 29.46
Arc Pro B60 29.58
+0.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
Arc Pro B60 13079
+0.4%
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124
+3.3%
120−130
−3.3%
1440p74
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
4K58
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.67
−133%
4.16
+133%
1440p16.20
−127%
7.13
+127%
4K20.67
−128%
9.07
+128%
  • Arc Pro B60 has 133% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc Pro B60 has 127% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc Pro B60 has 128% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 337
+12.3%
300−310
−12.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 119
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 153
+2%
150−160
−2%
Counter-Strike 2 291
+0.3%
290−300
−0.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Far Cry 5 162
+1.3%
160−170
−1.3%
Fortnite 210
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 127
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
Forza Horizon 5 119
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 90
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%
Valorant 296
+2.1%
290−300
−2.1%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 147
+5%
140−150
−5%
Counter-Strike 2 205
+2.5%
200−210
−2.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+2.2%
270−280
−2.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
+0%
65−70
+0%
Dota 2 252
+0.8%
250−260
−0.8%
Far Cry 5 149
+6.4%
140−150
−6.4%
Fortnite 199
+4.7%
190−200
−4.7%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+0.8%
120−130
−0.8%
Forza Horizon 5 106
+6%
100−105
−6%
Grand Theft Auto V 160
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 72
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Metro Exodus 96
+1.1%
95−100
−1.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+2.2%
180−190
−2.2%
Valorant 275
+1.9%
270−280
−1.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 137
+5.4%
130−140
−5.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
Dota 2 232
+0.9%
230−240
−0.9%
Far Cry 5 140
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 55
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+2%
100−105
−2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 181
+0.6%
180−190
−0.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 111
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+3%
100−105
−3%
Metro Exodus 58
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%
Valorant 258
+3.2%
250−260
−3.2%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+5%
80−85
−5%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry 5 101
+1%
100−105
−1%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 99
+4.2%
95−100
−4.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Valorant 257
+2.8%
250−260
−2.8%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 71
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Dota 2 160
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44
+10%
40−45
−10%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 60
+0%
60−65
+0%

This is how Titan X Pascal and Arc Pro B60 compete in popular games:

  • Titan X Pascal is 3% faster in 1080p
  • Titan X Pascal is 6% faster in 1440p
  • Titan X Pascal is 5% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.46 29.58
Recency 2 August 2016 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 200 Watt

Arc Pro B60 has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Titan X Pascal and Arc Pro B60.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B60 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
Intel Arc Pro B60
Arc Pro B60

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3008 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 13 votes

Rate Arc Pro B60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or Arc Pro B60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.