RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server vs Titan X Pascal

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, including specs and performance data.

Titan X Pascal
2016
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
29.46

PRO 6000 Blackwell Server outperforms Titan X Pascal by a whopping 221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1995
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.75no data
Power efficiency9.5012.71
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGP102GB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 August 2016 (9 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358424064
Core clock speed1417 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate342.91,968.0
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs96192
TMUs224752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188
L1 Cache1.3 MB23.5 MB
L2 Cache3 MB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount12 GB96 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 29.46
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server 94.61
+221%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server 42222
+224%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124
−182%
350−400
+182%
1440p74
−211%
230−240
+211%
4K58
−210%
180−190
+210%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.67no data
1440p16.20no data
4K20.67no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 337
−212%
1050−1100
+212%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
−213%
260−270
+213%
Hogwarts Legacy 119
−194%
350−400
+194%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 153
−194%
450−500
+194%
Counter-Strike 2 291
−209%
900−950
+209%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
−211%
230−240
+211%
Far Cry 5 162
−209%
500−550
+209%
Fortnite 210
−210%
650−700
+210%
Forza Horizon 4 127
−215%
400−450
+215%
Forza Horizon 5 119
−194%
350−400
+194%
Hogwarts Legacy 90
−211%
280−290
+211%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
−210%
350−400
+210%
Valorant 296
−221%
950−1000
+221%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 147
−206%
450−500
+206%
Counter-Strike 2 205
−217%
650−700
+217%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−208%
850−900
+208%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
−208%
200−210
+208%
Dota 2 252
−217%
800−850
+217%
Far Cry 5 149
−202%
450−500
+202%
Fortnite 199
−202%
600−650
+202%
Forza Horizon 4 121
−189%
350−400
+189%
Forza Horizon 5 106
−183%
300−310
+183%
Grand Theft Auto V 160
−213%
500−550
+213%
Hogwarts Legacy 72
−219%
230−240
+219%
Metro Exodus 96
−213%
300−310
+213%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
−210%
350−400
+210%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
−199%
550−600
+199%
Valorant 275
−209%
850−900
+209%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 137
−192%
400−450
+192%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
−216%
180−190
+216%
Dota 2 232
−202%
700−750
+202%
Far Cry 5 140
−186%
400−450
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 112
−213%
350−400
+213%
Hogwarts Legacy 55
−209%
170−180
+209%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
−194%
300−310
+194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
−216%
300−310
+216%
Valorant 181
−204%
550−600
+204%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170
−194%
500−550
+194%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 111
−215%
350−400
+215%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−218%
700−750
+218%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
−191%
300−310
+191%
Metro Exodus 58
−210%
180−190
+210%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−214%
550−600
+214%
Valorant 258
−210%
800−850
+210%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
−210%
260−270
+210%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
−197%
110−120
+197%
Far Cry 5 101
−197%
300−310
+197%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−218%
270−280
+218%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
−217%
130−140
+217%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−204%
170−180
+204%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
−213%
250−260
+213%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−194%
100−105
+194%
Grand Theft Auto V 99
−203%
300−310
+203%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Metro Exodus 36
−206%
110−120
+206%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
−209%
210−220
+209%
Valorant 257
−211%
800−850
+211%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 71
−210%
220−230
+210%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−194%
100−105
+194%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−194%
50−55
+194%
Dota 2 160
−213%
500−550
+213%
Far Cry 5 53
−221%
170−180
+221%
Forza Horizon 4 73
−215%
230−240
+215%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
−218%
70−75
+218%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44
−218%
140−150
+218%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 60
−217%
190−200
+217%

This is how Titan X Pascal and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is 182% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is 211% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is 210% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.46 94.61
Recency 2 August 2016 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 600 Watt

Titan X Pascal has 140% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, on the other hand, has a 221.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is our recommended choice as it beats the Titan X Pascal in performance tests.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3008 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 14 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.