GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1660 Max-Q GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
24.93

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms P4200 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking225205
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data100.00
Power efficiency17.3024.78
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU116
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041536
Core clock speed1227 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate237.2152.6
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPS4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs14496

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
−20%
90
+20%
1440p50−55
−20%
60
+20%
4K30−35
−26.7%
38
+26.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.54
1440pno data3.82
4Kno data6.03

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
−67.7%
109
+67.7%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−37%
63
+37%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−68.6%
86
+68.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
−24.6%
81
+24.6%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−18.1%
111
+18.1%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−17.4%
54
+17.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−33.3%
68
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−17.7%
93
+17.7%
Fortnite 110−120
−10.3%
120−130
+10.3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−42.6%
134
+42.6%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−3%
69
+3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−16.3%
100−110
+16.3%
Valorant 160−170
−28.2%
209
+28.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+30%
50
−30%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−9.6%
103
+9.6%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−6.5%
49
+6.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−4.7%
260−270
+4.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−5.9%
54
+5.9%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−12.7%
89
+12.7%
Fortnite 110−120
−10.3%
120−130
+10.3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−33%
125
+33%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+11.7%
60
−11.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
−22.1%
105
+22.1%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−3.8%
54
+3.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−16.3%
100−110
+16.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−47.1%
103
+47.1%
Valorant 160−170
−27%
207
+27%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
94
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−2%
52
+2%
Dota 2 120−130
+4.3%
116
−4.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−5.1%
83
+5.1%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−5.3%
99
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+34%
50
−34%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−18.5%
109
+18.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+27.3%
55
−27.3%
Valorant 160−170
+30.4%
125
−30.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+9.3%
107
−9.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−12.6%
180−190
+12.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+6.7%
30
−6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+3%
197
−3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−4.5%
69
+4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−8.7%
25
+8.7%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−11.1%
60
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−16.4%
70−75
+16.4%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
42
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−17.9%
45−50
+17.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−23.2%
69
+23.2%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−18.2%
50−55
+18.2%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+5.3%
19
−5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 130−140
−10.1%
152
+10.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−5.6%
38
+5.6%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
−9%
85
+9%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−14.8%
31
+14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−14.3%
45−50
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−19.2%
30−35
+19.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how Quadro P4200 and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 20% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 20% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 27% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 34% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 69% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 10 tests (15%)
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is ahead in 49 tests (73%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (12%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 24.93 28.56
Recency 21 February 2018 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1070 Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
RTX 2060 Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
GTX 1660 GeForce GTX 1660
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Mobile
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 58 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1613 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.