Quadro P2000 Mobile vs P4200
Aggregated performance score
P4200 outperforms P2000 Mobile by 48% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 196 | 299 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 7.55 | 3.34 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | GP107GL |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 7 May 2018 (5 years ago) | 5 July 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Current price | $1526 | $1477 |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Quadro P4200 has 126% better value for money than P2000 Mobile.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1468 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 3,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 237.2 | 77.14 |
Size and compatibility
Information on Quadro P4200 and Quadro P2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7132 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | 96.13 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+51.9%
|
27−30
−51.9%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50
+63.3%
|
30−33
−63.3%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
+63%
|
27−30
−63%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 80−85
+62%
|
50−55
−62%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 65−70
+65%
|
40−45
−65%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+51.9%
|
27−30
−51.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65−70
+65%
|
40−45
−65%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 65−70
+65%
|
40−45
−65%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
+52.7%
|
55−60
−52.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 75−80
+50%
|
50−55
−50%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
+54.3%
|
35−40
−54.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+51.9%
|
27−30
−51.9%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
+57.1%
|
35−40
−57.1%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
+60%
|
30−33
−60%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50
+63.3%
|
30−33
−63.3%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
+63%
|
27−30
−63%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 80−85
+62%
|
50−55
−62%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 65−70
+65%
|
40−45
−65%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+51.9%
|
27−30
−51.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65−70
+65%
|
40−45
−65%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 65−70
+65%
|
40−45
−65%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
+52.7%
|
55−60
−52.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 75−80
+50%
|
50−55
−50%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
+54.3%
|
35−40
−54.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
+55.6%
|
27−30
−55.6%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+51.9%
|
27−30
−51.9%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
+57.1%
|
35−40
−57.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60
+62.9%
|
35−40
−62.9%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
+60%
|
30−33
−60%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50
+63.3%
|
30−33
−63.3%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
+63%
|
27−30
−63%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 80−85
+62%
|
50−55
−62%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+51.9%
|
27−30
−51.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65−70
+65%
|
40−45
−65%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 65−70
+65%
|
40−45
−65%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
+52.7%
|
55−60
−52.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60
+62.9%
|
35−40
−62.9%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
+60%
|
30−33
−60%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+62.5%
|
24−27
−62.5%
|
| Hitman 3 | 40−45
+55.6%
|
27−30
−55.6%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+57.1%
|
21−24
−57.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+56.3%
|
16−18
−56.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
+57.1%
|
21−24
−57.1%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
+56.3%
|
16−18
−56.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+60%
|
35−40
−60%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+60%
|
10−11
−60%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+59.3%
|
27−30
−59.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
+60%
|
30−33
−60%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+48.6%
|
35−40
−48.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−33
+66.7%
|
18−20
−66.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20−22
+66.7%
|
12−14
−66.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
+60%
|
10−11
−60%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+62.5%
|
8−9
−62.5%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
+60%
|
10−11
−60%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+55.6%
|
9−10
−55.6%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−33
+66.7%
|
18−20
−66.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+50%
|
14−16
−50%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+66.7%
|
21−24
−66.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−12
+57.1%
|
7−8
−57.1%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 25.04 | 16.87 |
| Recency | 7 May 2018 | 5 July 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 50 Watt |
The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Mobile in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
