GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Quadro P4200

Place in performance ranking	196	304
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.81	10.55
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GP104	N18P-G62 Max-Q
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	7 May 2018 (6 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	$1526	$1183

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has 35% better value for money than Quadro P4200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1024
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	1035 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	237.2	76.80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P4200 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7132 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.3 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.140
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P4200 25.11
+51.2%

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.61

Quadro P4200 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P4200 10685
+66.6%

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6414

Quadro P4200 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 67% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	80−85 +48.1%	54 −48.1%
1440p	40−45 +42.9%	28 −42.9%
4K	30−35 +30.4%	23 −30.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40
+34.6%

24−27

−34.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +42.9%	49 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +44.7%	38 −44.7%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +48.1%	50−55 −48.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +44.4%	45 −44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +34.6%	24−27 −34.6%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +41%	35−40 −41%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +44.4%	45−50 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +41%	75−80 −41%
Hitman 3	65−70 +44.4%	45 −44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +49.5%	107 −49.5%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +51.2%	86 −51.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +50.8%	63 −50.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +42.9%	77 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +42.9%	49 −42.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +46.3%	41 −46.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +45.8%	24 −45.8%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +48.1%	50−55 −48.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +47.1%	34 −47.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +34.6%	24−27 −34.6%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +41%	35−40 −41%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +44.4%	45−50 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +41%	75−80 −41%
Hitman 3	50−55 +38.9%	36 −38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +43.9%	65−70 −43.9%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +46.6%	58 −46.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +50.9%	53 −50.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +45.2%	62 −45.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +48.1%	54 −48.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	290−300 +50.3%	193 −50.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +42.1%	19 −42.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +50%	12 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +36.4%	22 −36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +34.6%	24−27 −34.6%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +41%	35−40 −41%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +41%	75−80 −41%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +49.1%	57 −49.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +48.1%	54 −48.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +40.6%	32 −40.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +50%	16 −50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70
+41.3%

−41.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +40.6%	30−35 −40.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +40.6%	30−35 −40.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +41.2%	16−18 −41.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +50%	12 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +36.4%	33 −36.4%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +40.6%	30−35 −40.6%
Hitman 3	35−40 +40%	25 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +46.3%	41 −46.3%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +42.9%	35 −42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +50%	14 −50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+48.1%

27−30

−48.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Hitman 3	21−24 +50%	14 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +40%	15 −40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +50%	20 −50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +40%	5 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +36.4%	22 −36.4%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+40%

14−16

−40%

This is how Quadro P4200 and GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

Quadro P4200 is 48% faster in 1080p
Quadro P4200 is 43% faster in 1440p
Quadro P4200 is 30% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	25.11	16.61
Recency	7 May 2018	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	35 Watt