Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
21.71

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms P4200 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking232227
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.1822.40
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU106
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042304
Core clock speed1227 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate237.2198.7
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPS6.359 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P4200 21.71
RTX 3000 Mobile 22.64
+4.3%
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P4200 10729
+6.1%
RTX 3000 Mobile 10116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
−5.6%
95
+5.6%
4K80−85
−10%
88
+10%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−4.4%
140−150
+4.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−5.9%
50−55
+5.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−6.3%
50−55
+6.3%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−3.2%
95−100
+3.2%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−4.4%
140−150
+4.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−5.9%
50−55
+5.9%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−3.8%
80−85
+3.8%
Fortnite 110−120
−3.4%
120−130
+3.4%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−4.3%
95−100
+4.3%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
−4%
75−80
+4%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−6.3%
50−55
+6.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−4.3%
95−100
+4.3%
Valorant 160−170
−3.1%
160−170
+3.1%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−3.2%
95−100
+3.2%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
−4.4%
140−150
+4.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−1.6%
250−260
+1.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−5.9%
50−55
+5.9%
Dota 2 120−130
−9.1%
132
+9.1%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−3.8%
80−85
+3.8%
Fortnite 110−120
−3.4%
120−130
+3.4%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−4.3%
95−100
+4.3%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
−4%
75−80
+4%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
−3.5%
85−90
+3.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−6.3%
50−55
+6.3%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−4.3%
95−100
+4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−55.7%
109
+55.7%
Valorant 160−170
−3.1%
160−170
+3.1%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−3.2%
95−100
+3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−5.9%
50−55
+5.9%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−3.8%
80−85
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−4.3%
95−100
+4.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
−6.3%
50−55
+6.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−4.3%
95−100
+4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+25%
56
−25%
Valorant 160−170
−3.1%
160−170
+3.1%
Fortnite 110−120
−3.4%
120−130
+3.4%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−3.6%
170−180
+3.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−0.6%
170−180
+0.6%
Valorant 200−210
−2%
200−210
+2%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−3%
65−70
+3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−8.7%
24−27
+8.7%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−5.7%
55−60
+5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−4.9%
60−65
+4.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%
Fortnite 55−60
−5.4%
55−60
+5.4%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−4.5%
45−50
+4.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−5.7%
35−40
+5.7%
Valorant 130−140
−4.3%
140−150
+4.3%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−5.6%
35−40
+5.6%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Dota 2 75−80
−12.8%
88
+12.8%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−4.8%
40−45
+4.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%
Fortnite 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%

This is how Quadro P4200 and RTX 3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 6% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 25% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 56% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is ahead in 64 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 21.71 22.64
Recency 21 February 2018 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P4200 and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
Quadro P4200 P4200
GTX 1650 NVIDIA GTX 1650
vs
Quadro P4200 P4200
GTX 1660 NVIDIA GTX 1660
vs
Quadro P4200 P4200
P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Mobile
vs
Quadro P4200 P4200
GTX 1650 Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1650 Mobile
vs
Quadro P4200 P4200
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
vs
Quadro P4200 P4200
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
vs
Quadro P4200 P4200
Quadro P520 Quadro P520
vs
Quadro P4200 P4200
RTX 4000 Max-Q NVIDIA RTX 4000 Max-Q
vs
Quadro P4200 P4200
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
vs
Quadro P4200 P4200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6
59 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
332 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 or Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.