RTX A2000 Mobile vs Quadro P4200
Aggregated performance score
RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms Quadro P4200 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 196 | 194 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 7.56 | no data |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | GA107 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 May 2018 (5 years ago) | 12 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | $1526 | no data |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 893 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1687 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 13,250 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | 237.2 | 108.6 |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on Quadro P4200 and RTX A2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM Capacity and Type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7132 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | 176.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported GPU Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | no data |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 8.6 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 75−80
−5.3%
| 79
+5.3%
|
| 1440p | 40−45
−2.5%
| 41
+2.5%
|
| 4K | 35−40
−8.6%
| 38
+8.6%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
−80.5%
|
74
+80.5%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
−25%
|
55
+25%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 80−85
−1.2%
|
80−85
+1.2%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 65−70
−1.5%
|
65−70
+1.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
−51.2%
|
62
+51.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65−70
−45.5%
|
96
+45.5%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 65−70
−9.1%
|
72
+9.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
−1.2%
|
85−90
+1.2%
|
| Hitman 3 | 75−80
−10.7%
|
83
+10.7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
−27.8%
|
69
+27.8%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
−20%
|
66
+20%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
−29.2%
|
62
+29.2%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
+12.8%
|
39
−12.8%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 80−85
−1.2%
|
80−85
+1.2%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 65−70
−1.5%
|
65−70
+1.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
−22%
|
50
+22%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65−70
−33.3%
|
88
+33.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 65−70
−7.6%
|
71
+7.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
−1.2%
|
85−90
+1.2%
|
| Hitman 3 | 75−80
−1.3%
|
76
+1.3%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
−5.6%
|
57
+5.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
−4.8%
|
44
+4.8%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
−9.1%
|
60
+9.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60
−68.4%
|
96
+68.4%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
−6.3%
|
51
+6.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40−45
+37.5%
|
32
−37.5%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 80−85
−1.2%
|
80−85
+1.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+0%
|
41
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65−70
−25.8%
|
83
+25.8%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 65−70
+11.9%
|
59
−11.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
−1.2%
|
85−90
+1.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60
+14%
|
50
−14%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
+65.5%
|
29
−65.5%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 40−45
−14.3%
|
48
+14.3%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
−24.2%
|
41
+24.2%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
−8%
|
27
+8%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
−17.6%
|
40
+17.6%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
−3.7%
|
27−30
+3.7%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
−8%
|
27
+8%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
−1.8%
|
55−60
+1.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−56.3%
|
25
+56.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−23.3%
|
53
+23.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
−2.1%
|
49
+2.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−1.9%
|
50−55
+1.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−33
−3.3%
|
30−35
+3.3%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
−5.3%
|
20
+5.3%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
−6.3%
|
16−18
+6.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
−7.7%
|
14−16
+7.7%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18−20
+5.9%
|
17
−5.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
−22.2%
|
33
+22.2%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−23.8%
|
26
+23.8%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
−4.2%
|
24−27
+4.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−2.9%
|
35−40
+2.9%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
This is how Quadro P4200 and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX A2000 Mobile is 5.3% faster than Quadro P4200 in 1080p
- RTX A2000 Mobile is 2.5% faster than Quadro P4200 in 1440p
- RTX A2000 Mobile is 8.6% faster than Quadro P4200 in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 65.5% faster than the RTX A2000 Mobile.
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 80.5% faster than the Quadro P4200.
All in all, in popular games:
- Quadro P4200 is ahead in 6 tests (9%)
- RTX A2000 Mobile is ahead in 51 test (75%)
- there's a draw in 11 tests (16%)
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 25.05 | 25.53 |
| Recency | 7 May 2018 | 12 April 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 95 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P4200 and RTX A2000 Mobile.
Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
