Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon Pro 5300M

Place in performance ranking	322	436
Place by popularity	not in top-100	81
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.75	no data
Architecture	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 14	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 November 2019 (4 years ago)	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price	$2068	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	96
Core clock speed	no data	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	100.0	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 5300M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40−45 +53.8%	26 −53.8%
1440p	24−27 +50%	16 −50%
4K	18−20 +50%	12 −50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27
+20%

−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +40.9%	22 −40.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +23.8%	21 −23.8%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +72.4%	27−30 −72.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −16.1%	36 +16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +50%	16 −50%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +63.6%	21−24 −63.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +61.5%	24−27 −61.5%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +58.7%	45−50 −58.7%
Hitman 3	30−33 +25%	24 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +34.8%	46 −34.8%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +45.7%	35 −45.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +153%	17 −153%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +28.9%	38 −28.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +127%	22 −127%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +63.2%	19 −63.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +44.4%	18 −44.4%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +72.4%	27−30 −72.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −3.2%	32 +3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +84.6%	13 −84.6%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +63.6%	21−24 −63.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +61.5%	24−27 −61.5%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +58.7%	45−50 −58.7%
Hitman 3	30−33 +36.4%	22 −36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −80.6%	112 +80.6%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +82.1%	28 −82.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +187%	15 −187%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +63.3%	30 −63.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +10%	30 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −68%	84 +68%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +121%	14 −121%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +85.7%	14−16 −85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +34.8%	23 −34.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +118%	11 −118%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +63.6%	21−24 −63.6%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +58.7%	45−50 −58.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +170%	23 −170%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +104%	24 −104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +136%	14 −136%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +47.1%	30−35 −47.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+207%

−207%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +93.3%	14−16 −93.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +77.8%	9−10 −77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +72.7%	10−12 −72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +14.3%	7 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +56.3%	16 −56.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +76.5%	16−18 −76.5%
Hitman 3	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +55%	20−22 −55%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +108%	12−14 −108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +47.4%	19 −47.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +77.8%	9−10 −77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+56.3%

16−18

−56.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Hitman 3	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +25%	12 −25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +75%	12−14 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+55.6%

9−10

−55.6%

This is how Pro 5300M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

Pro 5300M is 54% faster in 1080p
Pro 5300M is 50% faster in 1440p
Pro 5300M is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Epic Preset, the Pro 5300M is 207% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 81% faster.

All in all, in popular games: