Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro 5300M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5300M with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5300M
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 65 Watt
15.45
+44.3%

Pro 5300M outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking322397
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.76no data
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA (2019−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 14Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2019 (4 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$2068 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128096
Boost clock speed1250 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate100.0no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 5300M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed12000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Hitman 3 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65 no data
Metro Exodus 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Hitman 3 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65 no data
Metro Exodus 50−55 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+55%
40−45
−55%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−33 no data
Hitman 3 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Hitman 3 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.45 10.71
Recency 13 November 2019 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm

The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 163 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2198 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.