UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs Radeon Pro 5300M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro 5300M with UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), including specs and performance data.
Pro 5300M outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a whopping 574% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 350 | 859 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 12.57 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | Navi 14 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 6,400 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 100.0 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.2 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | no data |
| TMUs | 80 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 70−75
+536%
| 11
−536%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+417%
|
6−7
−417%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+900%
|
5−6
−900%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+417%
|
6−7
−417%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+433%
|
12
−433%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+4000%
|
1−2
−4000%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
+514%
|
7
−514%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35−40
+322%
|
9−10
−322%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+688%
|
8
−688%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+900%
|
5−6
−900%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+417%
|
6−7
−417%
|
| Dota 2 | 55−60
+367%
|
12
−367%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+273%
|
15
−273%
|
| Fortnite | 85−90
+617%
|
12−14
−617%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+482%
|
11
−482%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+4000%
|
1−2
−4000%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55−60
+833%
|
6
−833%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
+975%
|
4
−975%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+405%
|
21−24
−405%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35−40
+322%
|
9−10
−322%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+433%
|
9−10
−433%
|
| Valorant | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 190−200
+360%
|
40−45
−360%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+900%
|
5−6
−900%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+417%
|
6−7
−417%
|
| Dota 2 | 55−60
+155%
|
22
−155%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+273%
|
14−16
−273%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+357%
|
14
−357%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+4000%
|
1−2
−4000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+405%
|
21−24
−405%
|
| Valorant | 60−65 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+2300%
|
1−2
−2300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+867%
|
14−16
−867%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
| World of Tanks | 100−110
+620%
|
14−16
−620%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+3000%
|
1−2
−3000%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+533%
|
6−7
−533%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+680%
|
5−6
−680%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+1100%
|
2−3
−1100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+580%
|
5−6
−580%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+320%
|
5−6
−320%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
+388%
|
8−9
−388%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
| Dota 2 | 27−30
+68.8%
|
16−18
−68.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+80%
|
14−16
−80%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+667%
|
6−7
−667%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+80%
|
14−16
−80%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+650%
|
2−3
−650%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Dota 2 | 27−30
+68.8%
|
16−18
−68.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Fortnite | 18−20
+1700%
|
1−2
−1700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 16−18
+750%
|
2−3
−750%
|
This is how Pro 5300M and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:
- Pro 5300M is 536% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 5300M is 4000% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Pro 5300M surpassed UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in all 55 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.49 | 2.15 |
| Recency | 13 November 2019 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Pro 5300M has a 574% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
