Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon Pro 5300M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5300M with Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5300M
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
15.41
+103%

Pro 5300M outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking346528
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Power efficiency12.4318.56
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 14Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128080
Core clock speed1000 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate100.0no data
Floating-point processing power3.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+84.2%
19
−84.2%
1440p18−21
+80%
10
−80%
4K30−35
+76.5%
17
−76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+71.4%
14
−71.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+84.2%
18−20
−84.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+31.6%
19
−31.6%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+127%
21−24
−127%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+107%
14−16
−107%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+84.6%
13
−84.6%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+112%
16−18
−112%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+104%
45−50
−104%
Hitman 3 27−30
+81.3%
16
−81.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+81.4%
40−45
−81.4%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+39.5%
38
−39.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+110%
20−22
−110%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+100%
24−27
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+27.4%
62
−27.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+84.2%
18−20
−84.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+56.3%
16
−56.3%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+127%
21−24
−127%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+107%
14−16
−107%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+140%
10
−140%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+112%
16−18
−112%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+104%
45−50
−104%
Hitman 3 27−30
+93.3%
15
−93.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+81.4%
40−45
−81.4%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+96.3%
27
−96.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+110%
20−22
−110%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+108%
24
−108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+68.2%
21−24
−68.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+61.2%
49
−61.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+84.2%
18−20
−84.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+107%
14−16
−107%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+200%
8
−200%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+112%
16−18
−112%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+104%
45−50
−104%
Hitman 3 27−30
+142%
12
−142%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+388%
16
−388%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+150%
20
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+236%
11
−236%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+110%
20−22
−110%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+200%
27−30
−200%
Hitman 3 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+75%
16
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+60%
10
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+102%
45−50
−102%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Hitman 3 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+212%
24−27
−212%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%

This is how Pro 5300M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5300M is 84% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5300M is 80% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5300M is 76% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5300M is 650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro 5300M surpassed Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.41 7.58
Recency 13 November 2019 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 28 Watt

Pro 5300M has a 103.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 203.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 169 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 921 vote

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.