Radeon Pro 5300M vs Quadro P2000 Mobile
Aggregated performance score
Quadro P2000 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 9% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 299 | 318 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 3.34 | 3.65 |
Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Navi / RDNA (2019−2020) |
GPU code name | GP107GL | Navi 14 |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 July 2017 (6 years ago) | 13 November 2019 (4 years ago) |
Current price | $1477 | $2068 |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Pro 5300M has 9% better value for money than P2000 Mobile.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,300 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 77.14 | 100.0 |
Size and compatibility
Information on Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.13 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 16.87 | 15.48 |
Recency | 5 July 2017 | 13 November 2019 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon Pro 5300M.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.