AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

M4000M
16.06
+3.8%

Quadro M4000M outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 4% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking307318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.353.65
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Navi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years old)13 November 2019 (4 years old)
Current price$832 $2068
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro 5300M has 9% better value for money than M4000M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,2801280
Core clock speed975 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1013 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate78.00100.0
Floating-point performance2,496 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M4000M 16.06
+3.8%
Pro 5300M 15.47

Quadro M4000M outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 4% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M4000M 6225
+3.8%
Pro 5300M 5996

Quadro M4000M outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD63
+5%
60−65
−5%
4K20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+6.3%
30−35
−6.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+7.7%
24−27
−7.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+3.8%
50−55
−3.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+4.8%
40−45
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5.6%
50−55
−5.6%
Hitman 3 45−50
+4.7%
40−45
−4.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+6.3%
30−35
−6.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+7.7%
24−27
−7.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+3.8%
50−55
−3.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+4.8%
40−45
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5.6%
50−55
−5.6%
Hitman 3 45−50
+4.7%
40−45
−4.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+6.3%
30−35
−6.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+7.7%
24−27
−7.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+3.8%
50−55
−3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+4.8%
40−45
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5.6%
50−55
−5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%
Hitman 3 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+3.4%
27−30
−3.4%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how M4000M and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • M4000M is 5% faster than Pro 5300M

4K resolution:

  • M4000M is 11.1% faster than Pro 5300M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the M4000M is 14.3% faster than the Pro 5300M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • M4000M is ahead in 62 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 16.06 15.47
Recency 2 October 2015 13 November 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro 5300M. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 116 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 158 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.