Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 680M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 680M SLI
2012
2x 4 GB GDDR5
16.53
+19%

GTX 680M SLI outperforms RX Vega M GL / 870 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking330374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.74
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameN13E-GTXVega Kaby Lake-G
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2012 (12 years ago)7 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores26881280
Core clock speed720 MHz931 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1011 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed3600 MHzno data
Shared memory--

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112_1
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 680M SLI 16.53
+19%
RX Vega M GL / 870 13.89

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 680M SLI 10952
+11.1%
RX Vega M GL / 870 9862

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p133
+20.9%
110−120
−20.9%
Full HD96
+118%
44
−118%
1440p30−35
+7.1%
28
−7.1%
4K16−18
+6.7%
15
−6.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+16%
24−27
−16%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Elden Ring 50−55
+21.4%
40−45
−21.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+16%
24−27
−16%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+21.4%
55−60
−21.4%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+2.3%
44
−2.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−20%
48
+20%
Valorant 65−70
+40.4%
47
−40.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+16%
24−27
−16%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Dota 2 55−60
+119%
27
−119%
Elden Ring 50−55
+21.4%
40−45
−21.4%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+59.5%
37
−59.5%
Fortnite 90−95
+16.7%
75−80
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+21.4%
55−60
−21.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+43.9%
41
−43.9%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+50%
30
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−11.2%
129
+11.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+150%
16
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+21.4%
40−45
−21.4%
Valorant 65−70
+120%
30
−120%
World of Tanks 229
+24.5%
180−190
−24.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+16%
24−27
−16%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Dota 2 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+15.7%
51
−15.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+21.4%
55−60
−21.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+14.9%
100−110
−14.9%
Valorant 65−70
+20%
55−60
−20%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 24−27
+25%
20−22
−25%
Elden Ring 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+25%
20−22
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+147%
62
−147%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
World of Tanks 110−120
+17.3%
95−100
−17.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+21.4%
27−30
−21.4%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+31.3%
32
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+24.2%
30−35
−24.2%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+37%
27
−37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Valorant 40−45
+23.5%
30−35
−23.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Dota 2 27−30
−3.6%
29
+3.6%
Elden Ring 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−3.6%
29
+3.6%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+63.3%
30
−63.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−3.6%
29
+3.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Dota 2 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+40%
15
−40%
Fortnite 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Valorant 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%

This is how GTX 680M SLI and RX Vega M GL / 870 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 680M SLI is 21% faster in 900p
  • GTX 680M SLI is 118% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 680M SLI is 7% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 680M SLI is 7% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 680M SLI is 150% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega M GL / 870 is 20% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 680M SLI is ahead in 58 tests (92%)
  • RX Vega M GL / 870 is ahead in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.53 13.89
Recency 4 June 2012 7 January 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

GTX 680M SLI has a 19% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega M GL / 870, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
GeForce GTX 680M SLI
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 118 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.