Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 309 | 299 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 30.38 | 27.66 |
Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
GPU code name | Wimbledon XT | N13E-GTX |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 May 2012 (11 years old) | 4 June 2012 (11 years old) |
Current price | $126 | $149 |
HD 7970M Crossfire has 10% better value for money than GTX 680M SLI.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 2688 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 720 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire and GeForce GTX 680M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | large |
SLI options | no data | + |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 2x 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Shared memory | - | - |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 | 11 |
CUDA | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GTX 680M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire by 4% in our combined benchmark results.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GeForce GTX 680M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire by 5% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire outperforms GeForce GTX 680M SLI by 2% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 132
−0.8%
| 133
+0.8%
|
Full HD | 102
+4.1%
| 98
−4.1%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
−4%
|
24−27
+4%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 30−35
−3%
|
30−35
+3%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 27−30
−3.7%
|
27−30
+3.7%
|
Battlefield 5 | 50−55
−3.7%
|
55−60
+3.7%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
−4.9%
|
40−45
+4.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
−4%
|
24−27
+4%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−4.8%
|
40−45
+4.8%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
−4.7%
|
45−50
+4.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−1.8%
|
55−60
+1.8%
|
Hitman 3 | 40−45
−4.5%
|
45−50
+4.5%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
−6.1%
|
35−40
+6.1%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
−2.9%
|
35−40
+2.9%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−3.3%
|
30−35
+3.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 30−35
−3%
|
30−35
+3%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 27−30
−3.7%
|
27−30
+3.7%
|
Battlefield 5 | 50−55
−3.7%
|
55−60
+3.7%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
−4.9%
|
40−45
+4.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
−4%
|
24−27
+4%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−4.8%
|
40−45
+4.8%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
−4.7%
|
45−50
+4.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−1.8%
|
55−60
+1.8%
|
Hitman 3 | 40−45
−4.5%
|
45−50
+4.5%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
−6.1%
|
35−40
+6.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 24−27
−4%
|
24−27
+4%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
−2.9%
|
35−40
+2.9%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
−2.9%
|
35−40
+2.9%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−3.3%
|
30−35
+3.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 30−35
−3%
|
30−35
+3%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 27−30
−3.7%
|
27−30
+3.7%
|
Battlefield 5 | 50−55
−3.7%
|
55−60
+3.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
−4%
|
24−27
+4%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−4.8%
|
40−45
+4.8%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
−4.7%
|
45−50
+4.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−1.8%
|
55−60
+1.8%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
−2.9%
|
35−40
+2.9%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−3.3%
|
30−35
+3.3%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
−4.3%
|
24−27
+4.3%
|
Hitman 3 | 24−27
−4%
|
24−27
+4%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
Metro Exodus | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 20−22
−5%
|
21−24
+5%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
−7.7%
|
14−16
+7.7%
|
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
−5.9%
|
35−40
+5.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−3.8%
|
27−30
+3.8%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 30−33
−3.3%
|
30−35
+3.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
−3.3%
|
30−35
+3.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−5.3%
|
20−22
+5.3%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−11
−10%
|
10−12
+10%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Hitman 3 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−5.9%
|
18−20
+5.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
−5%
|
21−24
+5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
This is how HD 7970M Crossfire and GTX 680M SLI compete in popular games:
900p resolution:
- GTX 680M SLI is 0.8% faster than HD 7970M Crossfire
1080p resolution:
- HD 7970M Crossfire is 4.1% faster than GTX 680M SLI
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 680M SLI is 16.7% faster than the HD 7970M Crossfire.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 680M SLI is ahead in 54 tests (79%)
- there's a draw in 14 tests (21%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 15.97 | 16.56 |
Recency | 1 May 2012 | 4 June 2012 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 2688 |
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire and GeForce GTX 680M SLI. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.