Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
M GL / 870 outperforms 670MX SLI by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 521 | 434 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 4.69 | 15.01 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Vega (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | N13E-GR | Vega Kaby Lake-G |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 October 2012 (13 years ago) | 7 January 2018 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1920 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 931 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1011 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5080 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2x 192 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12_1 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 71
+65.1%
| 43
−65.1%
|
| 1440p | 18−21
−55.6%
| 28
+55.6%
|
| 4K | 10−12
−40%
| 14
+40%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
−44.9%
|
70−75
+44.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
−42.1%
|
27−30
+42.1%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18−20
−44.4%
|
24−27
+44.4%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−51.2%
|
62
+51.2%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
−44.9%
|
70−75
+44.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
−42.1%
|
27−30
+42.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−40%
|
42
+40%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−53.6%
|
86
+53.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−35%
|
50−55
+35%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
−42.9%
|
40−45
+42.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−42.4%
|
45−50
+42.4%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−24.4%
|
110−120
+24.4%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−26.8%
|
52
+26.8%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
−44.9%
|
70−75
+44.9%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 168
−7.1%
|
180−190
+7.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
−42.1%
|
27−30
+42.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
−25%
|
85−90
+25%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−30%
|
39
+30%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
56
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−35%
|
50−55
+35%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
−42.9%
|
40−45
+42.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−20.6%
|
41
+20.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
−33.3%
|
24
+33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−42.4%
|
45−50
+42.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−70.8%
|
41
+70.8%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−24.4%
|
110−120
+24.4%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−17.1%
|
48
+17.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
−42.1%
|
27−30
+42.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
−25%
|
85−90
+25%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−20%
|
36
+20%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−35%
|
50−55
+35%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−42.4%
|
45−50
+42.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−24.4%
|
110−120
+24.4%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 55−60
+47.4%
|
38
−47.4%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−41.2%
|
24−27
+41.2%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
−37.1%
|
95−100
+37.1%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
−66.7%
|
20−22
+66.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
−40%
|
14
+40%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
−29.2%
|
62
+29.2%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
−32%
|
130−140
+32%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
−54.5%
|
34
+54.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−26.3%
|
24
+26.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−40.9%
|
30−35
+40.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18−20
+38.5%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 18−20
−26.3%
|
24
+26.3%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
−45%
|
29
+45%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−40%
|
14
+40%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−45.8%
|
70−75
+45.8%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
−45.5%
|
16
+45.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35
−38.2%
|
45−50
+38.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12
+33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−46.7%
|
21−24
+46.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
+0%
|
9
+0%
|
This is how GTX 670MX SLI and RX Vega M GL / 870 compete in popular games:
- GTX 670MX SLI is 65% faster in 1080p
- RX Vega M GL / 870 is 56% faster in 1440p
- RX Vega M GL / 870 is 40% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Epic Preset, the GTX 670MX SLI is 47% faster.
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GL / 870 is 125% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 670MX SLI performs better in 1 test (2%)
- RX Vega M GL / 870 performs better in 56 tests (93%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.13 | 12.67 |
| Recency | 1 October 2012 | 7 January 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
RX Vega M GL / 870 has a 39% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 131% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
