Arc Graphics 140V vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Aggregate performance score
We've compared M1 8-Core GPU and Arc Graphics 140V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 378 | 383 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | no data | Xe² (2025) |
GPU code name | no data | Lunar Lake iGPU |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 8 |
Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 3 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | LPDDR5x |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 16 GB |
Shared memory | + | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | no data | 12_2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 27
−48.1%
| 40
+48.1%
|
1440p | 18−21
−11.1%
| 20
+11.1%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
−87.5%
|
45
+87.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+12.5%
|
24−27
−12.5%
|
Elden Ring | 40−45
+2.5%
|
40−45
−2.5%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+2.3%
|
40−45
−2.3%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
−54.2%
|
37
+54.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+12.5%
|
24−27
−12.5%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−41.8%
|
78
+41.8%
|
Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Valorant | 50−55
+1.9%
|
50−55
−1.9%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+2.3%
|
40−45
−2.3%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
−25%
|
30
+25%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+12.5%
|
24−27
−12.5%
|
Dota 2 | 45−50
+11.4%
|
44
−11.4%
|
Elden Ring | 40−45
+2.5%
|
40−45
−2.5%
|
Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+48.6%
|
35
−48.6%
|
Fortnite | 75−80
+1.3%
|
75−80
−1.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−18.2%
|
65
+18.2%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 45−50
+14%
|
43
−14%
|
Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−105
+1%
|
95−100
−1%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+2.4%
|
40−45
−2.4%
|
Valorant | 50−55
+1.9%
|
50−55
−1.9%
|
World of Tanks | 180−190
+1.1%
|
180−190
−1.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+2.3%
|
40−45
−2.3%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
−4.2%
|
25
+4.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+12.5%
|
24−27
−12.5%
|
Dota 2 | 45−50
+8.9%
|
45−50
−8.9%
|
Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+2%
|
50−55
−2%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−3.6%
|
57
+3.6%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−105
+1%
|
95−100
−1%
|
Valorant | 50−55
+1.9%
|
50−55
−1.9%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18
−5.6%
|
Elden Ring | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+9%
|
100−105
−9%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 95−100
+2.1%
|
95−100
−2.1%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
−16.7%
|
14
+16.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+3.2%
|
30−35
−3.2%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+3.1%
|
30−35
−3.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Valorant | 30−35
+3%
|
30−35
−3%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Dota 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+2.6%
|
35−40
−2.6%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Dota 2 | 24−27
+14.3%
|
21−24
−14.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Fortnite | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
Valorant | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14−16
−7.1%
|
This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 140V is 48% faster in 1080p
- Arc Graphics 140V is 11% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 49% faster.
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 88% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Apple M1 8-Core GPU is ahead in 30 tests (56%)
- Arc Graphics 140V is ahead in 8 tests (15%)
- there's a draw in 16 tests (30%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 13.71 | 13.41 |
Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 2.2% higher aggregate performance score.
Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between M1 8-Core GPU and Arc Graphics 140V.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.