AMD Radeon R9 Nano: specs and benchmarks

Price now 9.98$
Games supported 86%
R9 Nano
Radeon R9 Nano
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 0
  • Max video memory 4096 MB
  • Memory type High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
  • Memory clock speed 500
  • Maximum resolution
Year of release 2015
Performance 21.56


AMD started Radeon R9 Nano sales 10 September 2015 at a recommended price of $649. This is a desktop graphics card based on a GCN 1.2 architecture and made with 28 nm manufacturing process. It is primarily aimed at gamer market. 4 GB of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) memory clocked at 500 GHz are supplied, and together with 4096 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 512 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is dual-slot card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 152 mm. 1x 8-pin power connector is required, and power consumption is at 175 Watt.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at


of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090

General info

Some basic facts about Radeon R9 Nano: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking194
Value for money5.28
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameFiji
Market segmentDesktop
Release date10 September 2015 (7 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$649
Current price$9.98 (0x MSRP)of 158889 (A100 PCIe)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

Radeon R9 Nano's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon R9 Nano's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Compute units64
Boost clock speed1000 MHzof 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors8,900 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 4 (GeForce RTX 4080)
Power consumption (TDP)175 Wattof 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate256.0of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)
Floating-point performance8,192 gflopsof 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Size and compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Radeon R9 Nano and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
Length152 mm
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire1


Parameters of memory installed on Radeon R9 Nano: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+
Maximum RAM amount4 GBof 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width4096 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed500 MHzof 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080)
Memory bandwidth512 GB/sof 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)
Shared memory-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon R9 Nano. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Number of Eyefinity displays6
DisplayPort support+


Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon R9 Nano. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

DDMA audio+

API support

APIs supported by Radeon R9 Nano, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12
Shader Model6.3
OpenGL4.5of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile)

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Radeon R9 Nano. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 Nano 21.56


This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 24%

R9 Nano 8486

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

R9 Nano 43546

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

R9 Nano 17282

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 13%

R9 Nano 12081

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

R9 Nano 81374

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

R9 Nano 14362

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

R9 Nano 402499

Unigine Heaven 4.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark, a newer version of Unigine 3.0 with relatively small differences. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. The benchmark is still sometimes used, despite its significant age, as it was released back in 2013.

Benchmark coverage: 1%

R9 Nano 1732

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R9 Nano. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 30 Mh/s  
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 295 Sol/s  

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Radeon R9 Nano is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD91

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
Battlefield 5 70−75
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
Far Cry 5 55−60
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
Hitman 3 65−70
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
Battlefield 5 70−75
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
Far Cry 5 55−60
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
Hitman 3 65−70
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
Metro Exodus 35−40
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
Battlefield 5 70−75
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
Far Cry 5 55−60
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45

High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
Hitman 3 35−40
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
Metro Exodus 20−22
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30

Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
Battlefield 5 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
Far Cry 5 35−40
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18

High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
Hitman 3 20−22
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
Metro Exodus 12−14
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35

Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
Battlefield 5 24−27
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
Far Cry 5 18−20
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10

Relative perfomance

Radeon R9 Nano's performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.

NVIDIA equivalent

According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon R9 Nano is GeForce GTX TITAN, which is slower by 3% and lower by 7 positions in our ranking.


Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R9 Nano:

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

RX 480Radeon RX480
RX 470Radeon RX470
RX 580Radeon RX580
GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX780 Ti
R9 390XRadeon R9390X
R9 290XRadeon R9290X

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Radeon R9 Nano according to our statistics.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.

4.3 78 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R9 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Radeon R9 Nano, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.