Radeon R9 Nano vs RX 9060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9060 9060 XT 9060 XT 8 GB 9060 XT 16 GB 9060 XT 16GB 9070 9070 GRE 9070 XT
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
255 OEM 260 OEM 270 270 1024SP 270X 280 280X 280X2 285 290 290X 290X2 295X2 360 OEM 370 370 1024SP 370X 380 380 OEM 380X 390 390 X2 390X 390X2 A375 Fury FURY X FURY X2 Nano

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 9060 and Radeon R9 Nano, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 9060
2025
8 GB GDDR6, 132 Watt
48.57
+140%

RX 9060 outperforms R9 Nano by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 9060 RX 9060
R9 Nano R9 Nano

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking72296
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.68
Power efficiency28.038.82
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0 (2025)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNavi 44Fiji
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date5 August 2025 (recently)27 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924096
Compute unitsno data64
Core clock speed1700 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2990 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors29,700 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate334.9256.0
Floating-point processing power21.43 TFLOPS8.192 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112256
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data152 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)no data+
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed2518 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth322.3 GB/s512 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI++
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
CrossFire-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
LiquidVR-+
PowerTune-+
TressFX-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.86.3
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.22.0
Vulkan1.3+
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 9060 48.57
+140%
R9 Nano 20.25

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 9060 20352
+140%
R9 Nano 8486

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD210−220
+131%
91
−131%
4K110−120
+139%
46
−139%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data7.13
4Kno data14.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
God of War 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
God of War 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
God of War 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
God of War 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+0%
47
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
God of War 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
God of War 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how RX 9060 and R9 Nano compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 is 131% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 is 139% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 48.57 20.25
Recency 5 August 2025 27 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 132 Watt 175 Watt

RX 9060 has a 139.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 32.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 9060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 Nano in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 9060
Radeon RX 9060
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Radeon R9 Nano
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 9060 Radeon RX 9060
vs
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
R9 Nano Radeon R9 Nano
vs
RX 480 Radeon RX 480
GTX 1070 NVIDIA GTX 1070
vs
RX 7400 7400
RX 9060 AMD RX 9060
vs
GTX 1070 1070
R9 Nano AMD R9 Nano
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell NVIDIA PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
R9 Nano Nano
R9 Nano AMD R9 Nano
vs
RX 7400 7400
RX 480 AMD RX 480
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell NVIDIA PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
RX 480 480
RX 480 480
vs
RX 7400 7400
RX 9060 9060
vs
RX 480 480
RX 470 AMD RX 470
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 4000 Blackwell SFF

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 9060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 93 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 9060 or Radeon R9 Nano, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.