Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro 5600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
24.02
+126%

Pro 5600M outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking237437
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Power efficiency33.13no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 12Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256096
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1030 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate164.8no data
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed770 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+111%
35−40
−111%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+144%
40−45
−144%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+137%
27−30
−137%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+133%
27−30
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+89.3%
27−30
−89.3%
Valorant 95−100
+134%
40−45
−134%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+111%
35−40
−111%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%
Dota 2 80−85
+118%
35−40
−118%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+74.4%
40−45
−74.4%
Fortnite 120−130
+96.8%
60−65
−96.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+144%
40−45
−144%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+137%
27−30
−137%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+118%
35−40
−118%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+117%
27−30
−117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+88.9%
80−85
−88.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+89.3%
27−30
−89.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+141%
30−35
−141%
Valorant 95−100
+134%
40−45
−134%
World of Tanks 250−260
+68.2%
150−160
−68.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+111%
35−40
−111%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%
Dota 2 80−85
+118%
35−40
−118%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+74.4%
40−45
−74.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+144%
40−45
−144%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+137%
27−30
−137%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+88.9%
80−85
−88.9%
Valorant 95−100
+140%
40−45
−140%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+133%
75−80
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
World of Tanks 160−170
+129%
70−75
−129%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+200%
21−24
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+138%
16−18
−138%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+129%
24−27
−129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Valorant 60−65
+137%
27−30
−137%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Dota 2 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+143%
30−33
−143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Dota 2 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+146%
12−14
−146%
Fortnite 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Valorant 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 34 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.02 10.62
Recency 15 June 2020 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm

Pro 5600M has a 126.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2644 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.