Celeron 1020E vs Athlon 64 TF-20
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron 1020E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2439 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon 64 | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Sherman (2009) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 1 May 2009 (15 years ago) | 20 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Current price | $4.99 | $27 |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron 1020E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus support | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 0.1 MB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 118 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron 1020E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1g1 | G2 (988B) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron 1020E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron 1020E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron 1020E are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron 1020E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2009 | 20 January 2013 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron 1020E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron 1020E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
