Turion 64 MT-32 vs Celeron 1020E
Aggregate performance score
Celeron 1020E outperforms Turion 64 MT-32 by a whopping 394% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 1020E and Turion 64 MT-32 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2543 | 3252 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 2.41 | 0.68 |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 20 January 2013 (11 years ago) | March 2005 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 1020E and Turion 64 MT-32 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.79 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 114 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 1020E and Turion 64 MT-32 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | G2 (988B) | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1020E and Turion 64 MT-32. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron 1020E and Turion 64 MT-32 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1020E and Turion 64 MT-32 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1020E and Turion 64 MT-32. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.89 | 0.18 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Celeron 1020E has a 394.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 309.1% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 MT-32, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.
The Celeron 1020E is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-32 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1020E and Turion 64 MT-32, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
