M-5Y31 vs Pro A10-8700B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pro A10-8700B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.39
+16.8%
Core M-5Y31
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.19

Pro A10-8700B outperforms Core M-5Y31 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pro A10-8700B and Core M-5Y31 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22142342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoIntel Core M
Power efficiency3.7622.52
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Broadwell-Y (2014)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)27 October 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pro A10-8700B and Core M-5Y31 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz0.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data50 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pro A10-8700B and Core M-5Y31 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCBGA1234
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core M-5Y31. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Pro A10-8700B and Core M-5Y31 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core M-5Y31 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core M-5Y31. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-2133DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 5300
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Max video memoryno data16 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data850 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pro A10-8700B and Core M-5Y31 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core M-5Y31 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data2560x1600@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core M-5Y31 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.2/12
OpenGLno data4.3
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core M-5Y31.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro A10-8700B 1.39
+16.8%
M-5Y31 1.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pro A10-8700B 2212
+16.7%
M-5Y31 1896

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pro A10-8700B 2200
M-5Y31 3396
+54.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pro A10-8700B 5907
M-5Y31 6563
+11.1%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pro A10-8700B 2798
+8.1%
M-5Y31 2589

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Pro A10-8700B 2
+4.1%
M-5Y31 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Pro A10-8700B 192
M-5Y31 208
+8.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Pro A10-8700B 70
M-5Y31 98
+40%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Pro A10-8700B 0.82
M-5Y31 1.09
+32.9%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Pro A10-8700B 0.9
M-5Y31 1.2
+41.2%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Pro A10-8700B 9
M-5Y31 10
+5%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Pro A10-8700B 45
M-5Y31 72
+58.6%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Pro A10-8700B 897
M-5Y31 1745
+94.5%

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Pro A10-8700B 2728
M-5Y31 3821
+40.1%

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Pro A10-8700B 950
M-5Y31 2179
+129%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.39 1.19
Recency 3 June 2015 27 October 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 4 Watt

Pro A10-8700B has a 16.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and 100% more physical cores.

M-5Y31, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Pro A10-8700B is our recommended choice as it beats the Core M-5Y31 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A10-8700B and Core M-5Y31, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Pro A10-8700B
Pro A10-8700B
Intel Core M-5Y31
Core M-5Y31

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 53 votes

Rate Pro A10-8700B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate Core M-5Y31 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pro A10-8700B or Core M-5Y31, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.