GeForce GTX 680M SLI vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

#ad 
Buy Radeon RX Vega M GH
VS
#ad 
Buy GeForce GTX 680M SLI
680M 680M SLI 680MX 680MX Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce GTX 680M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega M GH
2018
4 GB HBM2, 100 Watt
16.06
+4.8%

RX Vega M GH outperforms GTX 680M SLI by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
GTX 680M SLI GTX 680M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking348359
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.62no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePolaris 22N13E-GTX
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)4 June 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362688
Core clock speed1063 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate114.2no data
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs96no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceIGPno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x 4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GH 16.06
+4.8%
GTX 680M SLI 15.32

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega M GH 14302
+30.6%
GTX 680M SLI 10952

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p130−140
−2.3%
133
+2.3%
Full HD59
−66.1%
98
+66.1%
1440p38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
4K28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+5.8%
85−90
−5.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+21.9%
30−35
−21.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Battlefield 5 81
+22.7%
65−70
−22.7%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+5.8%
85−90
−5.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+3.9%
50−55
−3.9%
Fortnite 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+4.7%
60−65
−4.7%
Forza Horizon 5 47
−2.1%
45−50
+2.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+5.4%
55−60
−5.4%
Valorant 120−130
+3.2%
120−130
−3.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Battlefield 5 66
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+5.8%
85−90
−5.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−10.1%
229
+10.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−39.1%
30−35
+39.1%
Dota 2 108
+13.7%
95−100
−13.7%
Far Cry 5 51
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+4.7%
60−65
−4.7%
Forza Horizon 5 35
−37.1%
45−50
+37.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+5.4%
55−60
−5.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+46.3%
40−45
−46.3%
Valorant 120−130
+3.2%
120−130
−3.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Battlefield 5 60
−10%
65−70
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−39.1%
30−35
+39.1%
Dota 2 95
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
−8.5%
50−55
+8.5%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+4.7%
60−65
−4.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+5.4%
55−60
−5.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
−20.6%
40−45
+20.6%
Valorant 120−130
+3.2%
120−130
−3.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+4.4%
110−120
−4.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+4.6%
150−160
−4.6%
Valorant 160−170
+3.9%
150−160
−3.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Battlefield 5 43
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.9%
30−35
−5.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+5.3%
35−40
−5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+5.9%
30−35
−5.9%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+3.6%
27−30
−3.6%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Valorant 85−90
+6%
80−85
−6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 21
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+5.6%
50−55
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%

This is how RX Vega M GH and GTX 680M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 680M SLI is 2% faster in 900p
  • GTX 680M SLI is 66% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega M GH is 9% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega M GH is 17% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GH is 46% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 680M SLI is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GH is ahead in 47 tests (71%)
  • GTX 680M SLI is ahead in 11 tests (17%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (12%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.06 15.32
Recency 1 February 2018 4 June 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

RX Vega M GH has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce GTX 680M SLI.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
GeForce GTX 680M SLI
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
GTX 965M SLI GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GTX 680M SLI GeForce GTX 680M SLI
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
HD 7790 Radeon HD 7790
vs
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT
RX 580 Radeon RX 580
vs
M3000 SE M3000 SE
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
vs
RX 7900 XT RX 7900 XT
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
Pro SSG Pro SSG
GT 520 GeForce GT 520
vs
RX 6400 RX 6400
GTX 980 Mobile GTX 980 Mobile
vs
GTX 1050 Ti 1050 Ti
R5 Graphics Radeon R5 Graphics
vs
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
6800 XT GeForce 6800 XT
vs
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
R9 FURY X Radeon R9 FURY X
vs
P104-101 P104 101

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GH or GeForce GTX 680M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.