FirePro D300 vs Quadro M4000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro M4000
2015
8GB GDDR5
17.27
+76.4%

Quadro M4000 outperforms FirePro D300 by 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking292421
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money10.423.95
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Pitcairn
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date29 June 2015 (8 years old)18 January 2014 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$791 no data
Current price$314 (0.4x MSRP)$260

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M4000 has 164% better value for money than FirePro D300.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16641280
Core clock speed773 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate80.3968.00
Floating-point performance2,573 gflops2,176 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm242 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz5080 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 192 GB/s162.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_1)
Shader Model55.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M4000 17.27
+76.4%
FirePro D300 9.79

Quadro M4000 outperforms FirePro D300 by 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro M4000 17949
FirePro D300 19273
+7.4%

FirePro D300 outperforms Quadro M4000 by 7% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro M4000 19934
+8.9%
FirePro D300 18308

Quadro M4000 outperforms FirePro D300 by 9% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 17.27 9.79
Recency 29 June 2015 18 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 150 Watt

The Quadro M4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 185 votes

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 24 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.