Radeon Pro 5300M vs RX 560X Mobile
Aggregated performance score
Pro 5300M outperforms RX 560X Mobile by 40% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 393 | 320 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.31 | 3.66 |
Architecture | Polaris (2016−2019) | Navi / RDNA (2019−2020) |
GPU code name | Polaris 11 | Navi 14 |
Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 January 2017 (7 years ago) | 13 November 2019 (4 years ago) |
Current price | $520 | $2068 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
RX 560X Mobile has 45% better value for money than Pro 5300M.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 1172 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60-80 Watt | 65 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 | 100.0 |
Floating-point performance | 2,611 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon RX 560X Mobile and Radeon Pro 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 92.8 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
FreeSync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 35
−28.6%
| 45−50
+28.6%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 23
−4.3%
|
24−27
+4.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 25
−28%
|
30−35
+28%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30
+15.4%
|
24−27
−15.4%
|
Battlefield 5 | 52
−1.9%
|
50−55
+1.9%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
−37.9%
|
40−45
+37.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 17
−41.2%
|
24−27
+41.2%
|
Far Cry 5 | 39
−2.6%
|
40−45
+2.6%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 39
−7.7%
|
40−45
+7.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 52
−3.8%
|
50−55
+3.8%
|
Hitman 3 | 39
−10.3%
|
40−45
+10.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
−43.5%
|
30−35
+43.5%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
−36.8%
|
24−27
+36.8%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27
−18.5%
|
30−35
+18.5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 29
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21
−52.4%
|
30−35
+52.4%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21
−23.8%
|
24−27
+23.8%
|
Battlefield 5 | 44
−20.5%
|
50−55
+20.5%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
−37.9%
|
40−45
+37.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 15
−60%
|
24−27
+60%
|
Far Cry 5 | 36
−11.1%
|
40−45
+11.1%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 36
−16.7%
|
40−45
+16.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 49
−10.2%
|
50−55
+10.2%
|
Hitman 3 | 34
−26.5%
|
40−45
+26.5%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
−43.5%
|
30−35
+43.5%
|
Metro Exodus | 20
−20%
|
24−27
+20%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
−36.8%
|
24−27
+36.8%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 25
−28%
|
30−35
+28%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 36
+9.1%
|
30−35
−9.1%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 25
−16%
|
27−30
+16%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16
−100%
|
30−35
+100%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
−52.9%
|
24−27
+52.9%
|
Battlefield 5 | 39
−35.9%
|
50−55
+35.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 13
−84.6%
|
24−27
+84.6%
|
Far Cry 5 | 33
−21.2%
|
40−45
+21.2%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 33
−27.3%
|
40−45
+27.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 38
−42.1%
|
50−55
+42.1%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 22
−50%
|
30−35
+50%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 11
−164%
|
27−30
+164%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16−18
−43.8%
|
21−24
+43.8%
|
Hitman 3 | 16−18
−41.2%
|
24−27
+41.2%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
Metro Exodus | 9−10
−55.6%
|
14−16
+55.6%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
−37.5%
|
10−12
+37.5%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16
−42.9%
|
20−22
+42.9%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−12
−45.5%
|
16−18
+45.5%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8
−85.7%
|
12−14
+85.7%
|
Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−65%
|
30−35
+65%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−38.9%
|
24−27
+38.9%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
−52.6%
|
27−30
+52.6%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
−50%
|
30−33
+50%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−60%
|
16−18
+60%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−66.7%
|
14−16
+66.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−60%
|
16−18
+60%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 10−12
−36.4%
|
14−16
+36.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−50%
|
21−24
+50%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
This is how RX 560X Mobile and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:
- Pro 5300M is 28.6% faster than RX 560X Mobile in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 560X Mobile is 15.4% faster than the Pro 5300M.
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5300M is 200% faster than the RX 560X Mobile.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 560X Mobile is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
- Pro 5300M is ahead in 65 tests (96%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (1%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 11.05 | 15.49 |
Recency | 5 January 2017 | 13 November 2019 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 65 Watt |
The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560X Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.