Radeon Pro 5600M vs RX 560X Mobile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX 560X Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5
11.12

Pro 5600M outperforms RX 560X Mobile by 116% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking389211
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation5.39no data
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 11Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 January 2017 (7 years ago)15 June 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$520 no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed1172 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1275 MHz1265 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60-80 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate81.60164.8
Floating-point performance2,611 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 560X Mobile and Radeon Pro 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz1540 MBps
Memory bandwidth92.8 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−114%
75−80
+114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 23
−69.6%
35−40
+69.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
−92%
45−50
+92%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
−40%
40−45
+40%
Battlefield 5 52
−50%
75−80
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−117%
60−65
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−129%
35−40
+129%
Far Cry 5 39
−61.5%
60−65
+61.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 39
−64.1%
60−65
+64.1%
Forza Horizon 4 52
−55.8%
80−85
+55.8%
Hitman 3 39
−84.6%
70−75
+84.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−122%
50−55
+122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−105%
35−40
+105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27
−96.3%
50−55
+96.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 29
−58.6%
45−50
+58.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
−129%
45−50
+129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
−100%
40−45
+100%
Battlefield 5 44
−77.3%
75−80
+77.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−117%
60−65
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−160%
35−40
+160%
Far Cry 5 36
−75%
60−65
+75%
Far Cry New Dawn 36
−77.8%
60−65
+77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 49
−65.3%
80−85
+65.3%
Hitman 3 34
−112%
70−75
+112%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−122%
50−55
+122%
Metro Exodus 20
−100%
40−45
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−105%
35−40
+105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25
−112%
50−55
+112%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
−50%
50−55
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
−84%
45−50
+84%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−147%
40−45
+147%
Battlefield 5 39
−100%
75−80
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−200%
35−40
+200%
Far Cry 5 33
−90.9%
60−65
+90.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
−93.9%
60−65
+93.9%
Forza Horizon 4 38
−113%
80−85
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−145%
50−55
+145%
Watch Dogs: Legion 11
−318%
45−50
+318%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−131%
35−40
+131%
Hitman 3 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−88.2%
30−35
+88.2%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−129%
30−35
+129%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−170%
50−55
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−128%
40−45
+128%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−142%
45−50
+142%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−133%
45−50
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−155%
27−30
+155%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Hitman 3 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−189%
24−27
+189%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−180%
27−30
+180%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−109%
21−24
+109%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%

This is how RX 560X Mobile and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is 114% faster than RX 560X Mobile in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 500% faster than the RX 560X Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro 5600M surpassed RX 560X Mobile in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 11.12 24.06
Recency 5 January 2017 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 50 Watt

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560X Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 363 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 71 vote

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.