Radeon Pro 5600M vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Aggregated performance score
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro 5600M by a minimal 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 202 | 213 |
| Place by popularity | 65 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2022) | Navi / RDNA (2019−2020) |
| GPU code name | GN20-P0 | Navi 10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 May 2021 (3 years ago) | 15 June 2020 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 1238 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1265 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP) | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 164.8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Radeon Pro 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1540 MBps |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 394.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 64
+6.7%
| 60−65
−6.7%
|
| 1440p | 44
+10%
| 40−45
−10%
|
| 4K | 26
+8.3%
| 24−27
−8.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 66
+69.2%
|
35−40
−69.2%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50
+2.1%
|
45−50
−2.1%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 58
+38.1%
|
40−45
−38.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 93
+19.2%
|
75−80
−19.2%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 65−70
+3.2%
|
60−65
−3.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 52
+33.3%
|
35−40
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 68
+7.9%
|
60−65
−7.9%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 83
+29.7%
|
60−65
−29.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
+3.8%
|
80−85
−3.8%
|
| Hitman 3 | 102
+41.7%
|
70−75
−41.7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 75
+47.1%
|
50−55
−47.1%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+2.6%
|
35−40
−2.6%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 71
+34%
|
50−55
−34%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 66
+43.5%
|
45−50
−43.5%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50
+2.1%
|
45−50
−2.1%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 32
−31.3%
|
40−45
+31.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 89
+14.1%
|
75−80
−14.1%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 65−70
+3.2%
|
60−65
−3.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 41
+5.1%
|
35−40
−5.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 64
+1.6%
|
60−65
−1.6%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 77
+20.3%
|
60−65
−20.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
+3.8%
|
80−85
−3.8%
|
| Hitman 3 | 71
−1.4%
|
70−75
+1.4%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 59
+15.7%
|
50−55
−15.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 49
+22.5%
|
40−45
−22.5%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+2.6%
|
35−40
−2.6%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 61
+15.1%
|
50−55
−15.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 81
+50%
|
50−55
−50%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 57
+23.9%
|
45−50
−23.9%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 45−50
+2.1%
|
45−50
−2.1%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24
−75%
|
40−45
+75%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 83
+6.4%
|
75−80
−6.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 34
−14.7%
|
35−40
+14.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 61
−3.3%
|
60−65
+3.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 66
+3.1%
|
60−65
−3.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
+3.8%
|
80−85
−3.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 46
−17.4%
|
50−55
+17.4%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 26
−76.9%
|
45−50
+76.9%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+2.7%
|
35−40
−2.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 44
+10%
|
40−45
−10%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 46
+43.8%
|
30−35
−43.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 29
+20.8%
|
24−27
−20.8%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 42
+31.3%
|
30−35
−31.3%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+3.8%
|
24−27
−3.8%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 22
−9.1%
|
24−27
+9.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 66
+22.2%
|
50−55
−22.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 49
+19.5%
|
40−45
−19.5%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 52
+13%
|
45−50
−13%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+4.1%
|
45−50
−4.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+3.6%
|
27−30
−3.6%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 19
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 21
−9.5%
|
21−24
+9.5%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 17
+13.3%
|
14−16
−13.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 23
+35.3%
|
16−18
−35.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 29
+11.5%
|
24−27
−11.5%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35
+25%
|
27−30
−25%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 19
−5.3%
|
20−22
+5.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+4.3%
|
21−24
−4.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+2.9%
|
30−35
−2.9%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:
- RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 7% faster in 1080p
- RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 10% faster in 1440p
- RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 8% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 69% faster than the Pro 5600M.
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 77% faster than the RTX 3050 4GB Mobile.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is ahead in 52 tests (76%)
- Pro 5600M is ahead in 10 tests (15%)
- there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 24.84 | 24.07 |
| Recency | 11 May 2021 | 15 June 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 50 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Radeon Pro 5600M.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
