Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile with Radeon Pro W5500M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
24.94
+379%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms Pro W5500M by a whopping 379% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking214614
Place by popularity52not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGN20-P0Navi 14
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)10 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481408
Core clock speed1238 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)85 Watt
Texture fill rateno data127.6
Floating-point processing powerno data4.083 gflops
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
+417%
12−14
−417%
1440p39
+388%
8−9
−388%
4K26
+420%
5−6
−420%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 66
+450%
12−14
−450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
+383%
12−14
−383%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+413%
16−18
−413%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+410%
10−11
−410%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+420%
10−11
−420%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+470%
10−11
−470%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+383%
30−33
−383%
Hitman 3 57
+470%
10−11
−470%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+379%
24−27
−379%
Metro Exodus 126
+425%
24−27
−425%
Red Dead Redemption 2 87
+383%
18−20
−383%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+425%
16−18
−425%
Watch Dogs: Legion 186
+431%
35−40
−431%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+433%
6−7
−433%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+413%
16−18
−413%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+410%
10−11
−410%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+413%
8−9
−413%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+470%
10−11
−470%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+383%
30−33
−383%
Hitman 3 55
+450%
10−11
−450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+379%
24−27
−379%
Metro Exodus 95
+428%
18−20
−428%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+425%
12−14
−425%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 94
+422%
18−20
−422%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180
+414%
35−40
−414%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+380%
5−6
−380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+410%
10−11
−410%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+386%
7−8
−386%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+470%
10−11
−470%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+383%
30−33
−383%
Hitman 3 51
+410%
10−11
−410%
Horizon Zero Dawn 74
+429%
14−16
−429%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 81
+406%
16−18
−406%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+411%
9−10
−411%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26
+420%
5−6
−420%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 72
+414%
14−16
−414%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+422%
9−10
−422%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 22
+450%
4−5
−450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+500%
3−4
−500%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+430%
27−30
−430%
Hitman 3 37
+429%
7−8
−429%
Horizon Zero Dawn 59
+392%
12−14
−392%
Metro Exodus 52
+420%
10−11
−420%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56
+460%
10−11
−460%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+417%
6−7
−417%
Watch Dogs: Legion 166
+453%
30−33
−453%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 53
+430%
10−11
−430%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Hitman 3 15
+400%
3−4
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+433%
24−27
−433%
Metro Exodus 37
+429%
7−8
−429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+383%
6−7
−383%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+386%
7−8
−386%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34
+386%
7−8
−386%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 25
+400%
5−6
−400%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Pro W5500M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 417% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 388% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 420% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.94 5.21
Recency 11 May 2021 10 February 2020
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 85 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 378.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 41.7% lower power consumption.

Pro W5500M, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W5500M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W5500M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1125 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.