Arc A750 vs UHD Graphics 750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

UHD Graphics 750
2021
15 Watt
4.48

Arc A750 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a whopping 877% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking62473
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.1021.62
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289
Current price$1454 $625 (2.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A750 has 930% better value for money than UHD Graphics 750.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2563584
Core clock speedno data2050 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate20.80537.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 750 and Arc A750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared16000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 750 4.48
Arc A750 43.79
+877%

Arc A750 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 877% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

UHD Graphics 750 1733
Arc A750 11943
+589%

Arc A750 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 589% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−940%
104
+940%
1440p6−7
−967%
64
+967%
4K3−4
−1167%
38
+1167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−675%
62
+675%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−2900%
90
+2900%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−870%
95−100
+870%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−960%
100−110
+960%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−600%
112
+600%
Hitman 3 10−11
−990%
100−110
+990%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−926%
195
+926%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−1500%
144
+1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−742%
100−110
+742%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1681%
285
+1681%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−1500%
96
+1500%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−588%
55
+588%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−2433%
76
+2433%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−870%
95−100
+870%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−353%
68
+353%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−450%
55
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−563%
106
+563%
Hitman 3 10−11
−990%
100−110
+990%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−753%
162
+753%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−1122%
110
+1122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−742%
100−110
+742%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−988%
174
+988%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1750%
185
+1750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−1383%
89
+1383%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−463%
45
+463%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−2200%
69
+2200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−870%
95−100
+870%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−463%
90
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−495%
113
+495%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−1000%
99
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−590%
69
+590%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−950%
63
+950%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−742%
100−110
+742%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−975%
85−90
+975%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−2033%
128
+2033%
Hitman 3 3−4
−1767%
55−60
+1767%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1100%
35−40
+1100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1800%
38
+1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−986%
76
+986%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1029%
79
+1029%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−820%
92
+820%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−8500%
86
+8500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1325%
57
+1325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−2400%
50
+2400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 12−14
−338%
57
+338%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−3900%
80
+3900%
Hitman 3 1−2
−3500%
35−40
+3500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1040%
55−60
+1040%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 69

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1300%
28
+1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1400%
30
+1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2050%
40−45
+2050%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1933%
61
+1933%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1060%
58
+1060%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−767%
52
+767%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%

This is how UHD Graphics 750 and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 940% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 967% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 1167% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A750 is 8500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc A750 surpassed UHD Graphics 750 in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.48 43.79
Recency 30 March 2021 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 750 is a notebook card while Arc A750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 355 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 682 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.