UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce GTX 650
Aggregated performance score
GeForce GTX 650 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 616 | 621 |
Place by popularity | 65 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.35 | 2.08 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) |
GPU code name | GK107 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 6 September 2012 (11 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | no data |
Current price | $207 (1.9x MSRP) | $1454 |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
UHD Graphics 750 has 494% better value for money than GTX 650.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 256 |
CUDA cores | 384 | no data |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1300 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1,270 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
Power consumption (TDP) | 64 Watt | 15 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion/sec | 20.80 |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 650 and UHD Graphics 750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | Ring Bus |
Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | no data |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | System Shared |
Memory bus width | 128-bit GDDR5 | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMI | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | 4 displays | no data |
HDMI | + | no data |
HDCP | + | no data |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Blu-Ray | + | no data |
3D Gaming | + | no data |
3D Vision | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GTX 650 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GeForce GTX 650 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 1% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 4.52 | 4.47 |
Recency | 6 September 2012 | 30 March 2021 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | System Shared |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 64 Watt | 15 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 650 and UHD Graphics 750.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 750 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.