Radeon 680M vs UHD Graphics 750

Place in the ranking	661	368
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.75	19.55
Architecture	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	Rembrandt+
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	768
Core clock speed	300 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	105.6
Floating-point processing power	0.6656 TFLOPS	3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	16	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 750 4.51

Radeon 680M 14.17
+214%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 750 1733

Radeon 680M 5448
+214%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10−12 −270%	37 +270%
1440p	5−6 −260%	18 +260%
4K	3−4 −233%	10 +233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −133%	28 +133%
Elden Ring	10−12 −209%	34 +209%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −254%	45−50 +254%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −91.7%	23 +91.7%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −195%	56 +195%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −290%	39 +290%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Valorant	9−10 −1689%	161 +1689%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −254%	45−50 +254%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −75%	21 +75%
Dota 2	14−16 −243%	48 +243%
Elden Ring	10−12 −500%	66 +500%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −56.5%	36 +56.5%
Fortnite	24−27 −208%	80−85 +208%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −147%	47 +147%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −157%	36 +157%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −170%	27 +170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −164%	100−110 +164%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −187%	40−45 +187%
Valorant	9−10 −233%	30 +233%
World of Tanks	75−80 −148%	180−190 +148%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −254%	45−50 +254%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −108%	24−27 +108%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −130%	50−55 +130%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −111%	40 +111%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −164%	100−110 +164%
Valorant	9−10 −1522%	146 +1522%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 −467%	17 +467%
Elden Ring	5−6 −340%	21−24 +340%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −467%	17 +467%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −297%	110−120 +297%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
World of Tanks	30−35 −213%	100−105 +213%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −367%	27−30 +367%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −240%	30−35 +240%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −350%	27 +350%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1450%	30−35 +1450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −183%	17 +183%
Valorant	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −56.3%	24−27 +56.3%
Elden Ring	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −56.3%	24−27 +56.3%
Metro Exodus	0−1	9−10
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −223%	40−45 +223%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −56.3%	24−27 +56.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Fortnite	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −367%	14 +367%
Valorant	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	9 +0%	9 +0%
Dota 2	61 +0%	61 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

9−10

+0%

9−10

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2 +0%	2 +0%
Dota 2	18 +0%	18 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics 750 and Radeon 680M compete in popular games:

Radeon 680M is 270% faster in 1080p
Radeon 680M is 260% faster in 1440p
Radeon 680M is 233% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 680M is 1689% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 680M is ahead in 52 tests (84%)
there's a draw in 10 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.51	14.17
Recency	30 March 2021	3 January 2023
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Radeon 680M, on the other hand, has a 214.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 680M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop card while Radeon 680M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.