Arc A750 vs UHD Graphics 730

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 730 and Arc A750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 730
2023
15 Watt
4.01

Arc A750 outperforms UHD Graphics 730 by a whopping 664% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking690180
Place by popularity76not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.51
Power efficiency19.139.75
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRaptor Lake GT1DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923584
Core clock speed300 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate18.60537.6
Floating-point processing power0.5952 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs6112
TMUs12224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 730 4.01
Arc A750 30.64
+664%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 730 1603
Arc A750 12246
+664%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−679%
109
+679%
1440p7−8
−743%
59
+743%
4K4−5
−800%
36
+800%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.65
1440pno data4.90
4Kno data8.03

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 91
+0%
91
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 285
+0%
285
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 116
+0%
116
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 76
+0%
76
+0%
Dota 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 239
+0%
239
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 99
+0%
99
+0%
Metro Exodus 94
+0%
94
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 199
+0%
199
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
World of Tanks 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 145
+0%
145
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 86
+0%
86
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+0%
84
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 730 and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 679% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 743% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 800% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.01 30.64
Recency 3 January 2023 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 has an age advantage of 2 months, and 1400% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has a 664.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 730 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1301 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 876 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.