Radeon Vega 7 vs UHD Graphics 750
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics 750 with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.
7 outperforms Graphics 750 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 711 | 594 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 13 |
| Power efficiency | 21.04 | 11.29 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Cezanne |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (4 years ago) | 13 April 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1900 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+++ | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 53.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6656 TFLOPS | 1.702 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 28 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | Ring Bus | IGP |
| Width | IGP | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 14−16
−64.3%
| 23
+64.3%
|
| 1440p | 16−18
−75%
| 28
+75%
|
| 4K | 10−12
−80%
| 18
+80%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−100%
|
30−35
+100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
−100%
|
18
+100%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10
−88.9%
|
17
+88.9%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−64.7%
|
28
+64.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−100%
|
30−35
+100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
−55.6%
|
14
+55.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−53.8%
|
20
+53.8%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
−163%
|
63
+163%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
−85%
|
37
+85%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−12
−118%
|
24
+118%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12
+33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−47.1%
|
24−27
+47.1%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
−32.1%
|
70−75
+32.1%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−35.3%
|
23
+35.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−100%
|
30−35
+100%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+27.6%
|
58
−27.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10
+11.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18
+38.5%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
−12.5%
|
27
+12.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
−75%
|
35
+75%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−12
−90.9%
|
21
+90.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
−30.8%
|
17
+30.8%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10
+11.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9
−62.5%
|
13
+62.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−35.3%
|
23
+35.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−50%
|
18
+50%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
−30.4%
|
73
+30.4%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21
+23.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+0%
|
9
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18
+38.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
−35%
|
27
+35%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10
−44.4%
|
12−14
+44.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−47.1%
|
24−27
+47.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−8.3%
|
13
+8.3%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+124%
|
25
−124%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 24−27
+71.4%
|
14
−71.4%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−44.4%
|
12−14
+44.4%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
−62.5%
|
50−55
+62.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−21.9%
|
35−40
+21.9%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−9.1%
|
48
+9.1%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−500%
|
12−14
+500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−75%
|
14−16
+75%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−60%
|
16−18
+60%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9
−75%
|
14−16
+75%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18−20
+12.5%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−19%
|
25
+19%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how UHD Graphics 750 and Vega 7 compete in popular games:
- Vega 7 is 64% faster in 1080p
- Vega 7 is 75% faster in 1440p
- Vega 7 is 80% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 124% faster.
- in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Vega 7 is 500% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 750 performs better in 3 tests (5%)
- Vega 7 performs better in 52 tests (87%)
- there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.92 | 6.31 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
UHD Graphics 750 has 200% lower power consumption.
Vega 7, on the other hand, has a 61% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
