Arc A380 vs UHD Graphics 750

Place in the ranking	664	336
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	43.85
Power efficiency	20.71	14.87
Architecture	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	DG2-128
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	1024
Core clock speed	300 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	131.2
Floating-point processing power	0.6656 TFLOPS	4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	16	64
Tensor Cores	no data	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	222 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	6 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	186.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 750 4.34

Arc A380 15.58
+259%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 750 1733

Arc A380 6225
+259%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

12−14

−292%

47
+292%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

12−14

−292%

47
+292%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −300%	50−55 +300%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −208%	37 +208%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −395%	94 +395%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −438%	40−45 +438%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −530%	63 +530%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −179%	35−40 +179%
Valorant	12−14 −442%	65−70 +442%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −300%	50−55 +300%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −158%	31 +158%
Dota 2	14−16 −136%	33 +136%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −178%	64 +178%
Fortnite	24−27 −242%	85−90 +242%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −321%	80 +321%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −438%	40−45 +438%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −136%	33 +136%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −340%	44 +340%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −195%	110−120 +195%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −179%	35−40 +179%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −233%	50−55 +233%
Valorant	12−14 −442%	65−70 +442%
World of Tanks	75−80 −172%	200−210 +172%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −300%	50−55 +300%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −125%	27 +125%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −152%	55−60 +152%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −221%	61 +221%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −438%	40−45 +438%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −195%	110−120 +195%
Valorant	12−14 −442%	65−70 +442%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 −525%	24−27 +525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −400%	150−160 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
World of Tanks	30−35 −250%	110−120 +250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −450%	30−35 +450%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −300%	40−45 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −317%	24−27 +317%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1700%	35−40 +1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −214%	21−24 +214%
Valorant	12−14 −215%	40−45 +215%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Dota 2	16−18 −75%	27−30 +75%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −75%	27−30 +75%
Metro Exodus	0−1	10−12
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −269%	45−50 +269%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −75%	27−30 +75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −300%	20−22 +300%
Fortnite	3−4 −533%	18−20 +533%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −667%	21−24 +667%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −550%	12−14 +550%
Valorant	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%

This is how UHD Graphics 750 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

Arc A380 is 292% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A380 is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Arc A380 surpassed UHD Graphics 750 in all 55 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.34	15.58
Recency	30 March 2021	14 June 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has 400% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 259% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.