AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Comparison of Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super architecture, market type and release date.
Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
APIs supported by Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
RX Vega 56 52.49 +4.9%
GTX 1660 Super 50.04
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
RX Vega 56 412820
GTX 1660 Super 471219 +14.1%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
RX Vega 56 125359 +38.6%
GTX 1660 Super 90435
3DMark Fire Strike Score
RX Vega 56 17098 +16.7%
GTX 1660 Super 14656
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
RX Vega 56 20759 +33.9%
GTX 1660 Super 15498
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
RX Vega 56 29086 +36.3%
GTX 1660 Super 21347
3DMark Vantage Performance
RX Vega 56 54586
GTX 1660 Super 60318 +10.5%
RX Vega 56 13324 +4.9%
GTX 1660 Super 12701
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
Let's see how good Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
4.9% faster in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (2048 vs 192 bit)
More pipelines (3584 vs 1408)
Higher memory bandwidth (409.6 vs 336 GB/s)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Much newer (29 October 2019 vs 14 August 2017)
Cheaper ($229 vs $399)
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 14 nm)
Less power hungry (125 vs 210 watts)
So, RX Vega 56 or GTX 1660 Super?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.