NVIDIA Titan X Pascal vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Comparison of Titan X Pascal and GeForce GTX 1660 Super architecture, market type and release date.
Titan X Pascal and GeForce GTX 1660 Super's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Titan X Pascal and GeForce GTX 1660 Super's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Titan X Pascal and GeForce GTX 1660 Super compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Parameters of memory installed on Titan X Pascal and GeForce GTX 1660 Super: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Titan X Pascal and GeForce GTX 1660 Super. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
APIs supported by Titan X Pascal and GeForce GTX 1660 Super, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Titan X Pascal and GeForce GTX 1660 Super. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Titan X Pascal 50.28 +2.8%
GTX 1660 Super 48.91
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Titan X Pascal 477626 +0.7%
GTX 1660 Super 474128
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Titan X Pascal 133293 +48.7%
GTX 1660 Super 89616
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Titan X Pascal 22588 +53.3%
GTX 1660 Super 14738
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Titan X Pascal 27282 +75.7%
GTX 1660 Super 15531
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Titan X Pascal 33884 +58.7%
GTX 1660 Super 21347
SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
Titan X Pascal 132 +59%
GTX 1660 Super 83
SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
Titan X Pascal 97
GTX 1660 Super 128 +32%
SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max
Titan X Pascal 152
GTX 1660 Super 154 +1.3%
Titan X Pascal 13026 +2.8%
GTX 1660 Super 12671
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Titan X Pascal and GeForce GTX 1660 Super. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
Let's see how good Titan X Pascal and GeForce GTX 1660 Super are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
2.8% faster in synthetic tests
Cheaper ($122.00 USD vs $607.00 USD)
Wider memory bus (384 vs 192 bit)
More pipelines (3584 vs 1408)
Higher memory bandwidth (480.4 vs 336 GB/s)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
G-SYNC (removes screen tearing by telling the display when to renew the image. Only works with G-SYNC compatible displays)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Much newer (29 October 2019 vs 25 July 2016)
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 16 nm)
Less power hungry (125 vs 250 watts)
So, Titan X Pascal or GTX 1660 Super?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Titan X Pascal and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Titan X Pascal and GeForce GTX 1660 Super, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.