1660 Super vs 1070

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 1070
34.85
+5.7%

1070 outperforms 1660 Super by 6% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking139152
Place by popularity373
Value for money26.8628.52
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code namePascal GP104Turing TU116
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 May 2016 (7 years old)29 October 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$379 $229
Current price$180 (0.5x MSRP)$277 (1.2x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Super has 6% better value for money than GTX 1070.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19201408
CUDA cores1920no data
Core clock speed1506 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt125 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate202.0157.1
Floating-point performance6,463 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)229 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed8 GB/s14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
HDCPno data+
G-SYNC support++

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
NVENCno data+
Ansel++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 34.85
+5.7%
GTX 1660 Super 32.96

1070 outperforms 1660 Super by 6% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1070 13510
+5.7%
GTX 1660 Super 12777

1070 outperforms 1660 Super by 6% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1070 50995
GTX 1660 Super 76654
+50.3%

1660 Super outperforms 1070 by 50% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1070 24652
+12.1%
GTX 1660 Super 21982

1070 outperforms 1660 Super by 12% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1070 18255
+15.3%
GTX 1660 Super 15829

1070 outperforms 1660 Super by 15% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1070 106934
+14.7%
GTX 1660 Super 93241

1070 outperforms 1660 Super by 15% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 1070 44821
GTX 1660 Super 62677
+39.8%

1660 Super outperforms 1070 by 40% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 1070 463865
GTX 1660 Super 477037
+2.8%

1660 Super outperforms 1070 by 3% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 1070 45962
GTX 1660 Super 60733
+32.1%

1660 Super outperforms 1070 by 32% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 1070 45301
GTX 1660 Super 65044
+43.6%

1660 Super outperforms 1070 by 44% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 82
GTX 1660 Super 83
+0.7%

1660 Super outperforms 1070 by 1% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 1070 132
+3.1%
GTX 1660 Super 128

1070 outperforms 1660 Super by 3% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Benchmark coverage: 1%

GTX 1070 169
+9.9%
GTX 1660 Super 154

1070 outperforms 1660 Super by 10% in SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+25.5%
94
−25.5%
1440p69
+27.8%
54
−27.8%
4K48
+54.8%
31
−54.8%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−26.7%
76
+26.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 89
+1.1%
88
−1.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−8.2%
66
+8.2%
Battlefield 5 141
+45.4%
97
−45.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 113
−3.5%
117
+3.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−5%
63
+5%
Far Cry 5 106
−5.7%
112
+5.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 107
−0.9%
108
+0.9%
Forza Horizon 4 129
−11.6%
144
+11.6%
Hitman 3 110−120
−6.4%
117
+6.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−17.3%
88
+17.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80
+3.9%
77
−3.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 96
−6.3%
102
+6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−27.7%
83
+27.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 76
+4.1%
73
−4.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+27.1%
48
−27.1%
Battlefield 5 119
+43.4%
83
−43.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 94
+4.4%
90
−4.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+15.4%
52
−15.4%
Far Cry 5 100
−3%
103
+3%
Far Cry New Dawn 101
+0%
101
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 121
−11.6%
135
+11.6%
Hitman 3 110−120
+13.4%
97
−13.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+15.4%
65
−15.4%
Metro Exodus 62
+10.7%
56
−10.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+0%
43
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
−3.6%
86
+3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120
+6.2%
113
−6.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−9.2%
71
+9.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55
+7.8%
51
−7.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+38.6%
44
−38.6%
Battlefield 5 107
+39%
77
−39%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+22.4%
49
−22.4%
Far Cry 5 90
−5.6%
95
+5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 91
−2.2%
93
+2.2%
Forza Horizon 4 94
−13.8%
107
+13.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+3.3%
61
−3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+110%
31
−110%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 62
+5.1%
59
−5.1%
Hitman 3 60−65
+3.3%
61
−3.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+9.1%
44
−9.1%
Metro Exodus 38
+5.6%
36
−5.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52
−1.9%
53
+1.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45
+12.5%
40
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+11.8%
34
−11.8%
Battlefield 5 84
+40%
60
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+4.6%
65
−4.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 71
+6%
67
−6%
Forza Horizon 4 79
−6.3%
84
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+9.1%
40−45
−9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+25%
24
−25%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
+6.3%
32
−6.3%
Hitman 3 30−35
+6.3%
32
−6.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+108%
12
−108%
Metro Exodus 23
+4.5%
22
−4.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
−3.8%
27
+3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+7.5%
40
−7.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 26
+8.3%
24
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+16.7%
18
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 45
+25%
36
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+6.1%
33
−6.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+8.6%
35
−8.6%
Forza Horizon 4 52
−3.8%
54
+3.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+41.7%
12
−41.7%

This is how GTX 1070 and GTX 1660 Super compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1070 is 25.5% faster than GTX 1660 Super

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1070 is 27.8% faster than GTX 1660 Super

4K resolution:

  • GTX 1070 is 54.8% faster than GTX 1660 Super

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1070 is 110% faster than the GTX 1660 Super.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1660 Super is 27.7% faster than the GTX 1070.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 is ahead in 41 test (60%)
  • GTX 1660 Super is ahead in 22 tests (32%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (7%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 34.85 32.96
Recency 6 May 2016 29 October 2019
Cost $379 $229
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 125 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1070 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7092 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16659 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.