Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Place in performance ranking	371	289
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	2.50	no data
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Vega Kaby Lake-G	N19P-Q1
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 January 2018 (6 years old)	27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Current price	$1359	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	768
Core clock speed	931 MHz	795 / 1230 MHz
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.88	75.60

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro T1000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX Vega M GL 11.99

T1000 Max-Q 17.34
+44.6%

Quadro T1000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL by 45% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX Vega M GL 4643

T1000 Max-Q 6716
+44.6%

Quadro T1000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL by 45% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	52 −44.2%	75−80 +44.2%
4K	18 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−42.1%

27−30
+42.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	33 −9.1%	35−40 +9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −43.9%	55−60 +43.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −45.2%	45−50 +45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −45.2%	45−50 +45.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −46.9%	45−50 +46.9%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −39.5%	60−65 +39.5%
Hitman 3	30−35 −53.1%	45−50 +53.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −48%	35−40 +48%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −45%	27−30 +45%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	37 +0%	35−40 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −50%	30−35 +50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 −33.3%	35−40 +33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −43.9%	55−60 +43.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −45.2%	45−50 +45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −45.2%	45−50 +45.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −46.9%	45−50 +46.9%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −39.5%	60−65 +39.5%
Hitman 3	30−35 −53.1%	45−50 +53.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −48%	35−40 +48%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −50%	27−30 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −45%	27−30 +45%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	31 −19.4%	35−40 +19.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 +18.9%	35−40 −18.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −50%	30−35 +50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17 −112%	35−40 +112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −43.9%	55−60 +43.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −45.2%	45−50 +45.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −46.9%	45−50 +46.9%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −39.5%	60−65 +39.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24 −54.2%	35−40 +54.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −50%	30−35 +50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −52.9%	24−27 +52.9%
Hitman 3	18−20 −47.4%	27−30 +47.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −27.8%	21−24 +27.8%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −46.7%	21−24 +46.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −87.5%	14−16 +87.5%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −65.2%	35−40 +65.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −52.6%	27−30 +52.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −57.1%	30−35 +57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Hitman 3	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10 +0%	10−11 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Battlefield 5	10−12 −72.7%	18−20 +72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%

This is how Pro WX Vega M GL and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

T1000 Max-Q is 44.2% faster than Pro WX Vega M GL

4K resolution:

T1000 Max-Q is 33.3% faster than Pro WX Vega M GL

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX Vega M GL is 18.9% faster than the T1000 Max-Q.
in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 112% faster than the Pro WX Vega M GL.

All in all, in popular games: