Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro T1000 Max-Q, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro WX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
10.67

T1000 Max-Q outperforms Pro WX Vega M GL by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro WX Vega M GL Pro WX Vega M GL
T1000 Max-Q T1000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking416329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.9923.84
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 22TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date24 April 2018 (6 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280896
Core clock speed931 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8875.60
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX Vega M GL 10.67
T1000 Max-Q 15.07
+41.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX Vega M GL 4768
T1000 Max-Q 6735
+41.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
4K18
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−45.3%
90−95
+45.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−41.7%
30−35
+41.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−45.3%
90−95
+45.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−41.7%
30−35
+41.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Fortnite 65−70
−32.4%
90−95
+32.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−36%
65−70
+36%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−44.4%
50−55
+44.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−45.2%
60−65
+45.2%
Valorant 100−110
−25%
130−140
+25%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−45.3%
90−95
+45.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−26.3%
210−220
+26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−41.7%
30−35
+41.7%
Dota 2 75−80
−25.3%
95−100
+25.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Fortnite 65−70
−32.4%
90−95
+32.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−36%
65−70
+36%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−44.4%
50−55
+44.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−40.9%
60−65
+40.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−45.2%
60−65
+45.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%
Valorant 100−110
−25%
130−140
+25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−41.7%
30−35
+41.7%
Dota 2 75−80
−25.3%
95−100
+25.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−36%
65−70
+36%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−45.2%
60−65
+45.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Valorant 100−110
−25%
130−140
+25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
−32.4%
90−95
+32.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−37.9%
120−130
+37.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−92.7%
150−160
+92.7%
Valorant 120−130
−30.4%
160−170
+30.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−48.4%
45−50
+48.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−46.4%
40−45
+46.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−48%
35−40
+48%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−53.3%
21−24
+53.3%
Valorant 60−65
−46.8%
90−95
+46.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Dota 2 40−45
−38.1%
55−60
+38.1%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−45%
27−30
+45%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

This is how Pro WX Vega M GL and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is 35% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Max-Q is 33% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 117% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, T1000 Max-Q surpassed Pro WX Vega M GL in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.67 15.07
Recency 24 April 2018 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 50 Watt

T1000 Max-Q has a 41.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX Vega M GL Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
vs
Pro Vega 16 Radeon Pro Vega 16
T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1000 Max-Q
vs
RTX A500 Mobile RTX A500 Mobile
Pro WX Vega M GL Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
vs
T550 Mobile T550 Mobile
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA A800 PCIe 40 GB
vs
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB V100 SXM2 32 GB
RTX 4070 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB V100 PCIe 16 GB
Arc A530M Intel Arc A530M
vs
RX 550X 640SP RX 550X 640SP
Radeon 780M AMD Radeon 780M
vs
RX Vega 24 Mobile RX Vega 24 Mobile
H100 SXM5 NVIDIA H100 SXM5
vs
RTX 5000 RTX 5000
Tegra X1 GPU NVIDIA Tegra X1 GPU
vs
R7 M260DX R7 M260DX
Jetson Orin NX 8 GB NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 8 GB
vs
Tegra X2 Tegra X2
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
vs
GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Mobile
Radeon 680M AMD Radeon 680M
vs
Playstation 3 RSX 65nm 3 RSX 65nm

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL or Quadro T1000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.