GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500X Radeon Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5700 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro W5700
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 205 Watt
38.54
+90%

Pro W5700 outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro W5700 Pro W5700
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking120276
Place by popularitynot in top-10062
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.74no data
Power efficiency12.9727.97
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 10TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date19 November 2019 (5 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1243 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1930 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate277.995.04
Floating-point processing power8.893 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W5700 38.54
+90%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.28

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W5700 14812
+90%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+89.7%
58
−89.7%
1440p80−85
+86%
43
−86%
4K45−50
+80%
25
−80%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.26no data
1440p9.99no data
4K17.76no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+0%
95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+0%
44
+0%
Valorant 98
+0%
98
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75
+0%
75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 45
+0%
45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 48
+0%
48
+0%
World of Tanks 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+0%
25
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
+0%
29
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+0%
63
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
World of Tanks 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how Pro W5700 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Pro W5700 is 90% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W5700 is 86% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W5700 is 80% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 38.54 20.28
Recency 19 November 2019 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 50 Watt

Pro W5700 has a 90% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 310% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700
vs
Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
RX 6500 Radeon RX 6500
Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700
vs
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680
vs
Apple M1 7-Core GPU M1 7 Core GPU
RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700
vs
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU M2 Max 38-Core GPU
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
vs
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
Pro 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M
vs
RX 6500 XT Radeon RX 6500 XT
GTX 1660 Super 1660 Super
vs
GTX 960A 960A
Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
vs
L4 L4
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
vs
Arc A770 Arc A770
RX 5900 RX 5900
vs
RX 7900 XTX 7900 XTX
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X 3060 Ti GDDR6X
A100 PCIe A100 PCIe
vs
A100X A100X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 95 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1727 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.