AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Comparison of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro T2000 Mobile architecture, market type and release date.
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro T2000 Mobile's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro T2000 Mobile's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
80.88 GTexel / s
114.2 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro T2000 Mobile: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
179.2 GB / s
128.0 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro T2000 Mobile.
APIs supported by Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro T2000 Mobile, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro T2000 Mobile. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Pro WX Vega M GL 28.57 +4.7%
T2000 Mobile 27.29
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Pro WX Vega M GL 10020
T2000 Mobile 13524 +35%
Pro WX Vega M GL 6049
T2000 Mobile 7985 +32%
Let's see how good Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro T2000 Mobile are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
4.7% faster in synthetic tests
More pipelines (1280 vs 1024)
Higher memory bandwidth (179.2 vs 128 GB/s)
Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Much newer (27 May 2019 vs 7 January 2018)
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 14 nm)
Less power hungry (60 vs 65 watts)
So, Pro WX Vega M GL or Quadro T2000 Mobile?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile. The differences in performance seem too small.
Be aware that Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is a mobile workstation card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro T2000 Mobile, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.