Pro 5300M vs Pro Vega 16

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Pro Vega 16
12.41

Pro 5300M outperforms Pro Vega 16 by 25% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking363318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money8.873.65
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameVega MobileNavi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date15 November 2018 (5 years old)13 November 2019 (4 years old)
Current price$511 $2068
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 16 has 143% better value for money than Pro 5300M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241280
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate76.16100.0

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon Pro 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2400 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth307.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 16 12.41
Pro 5300M 15.47
+24.7%

Pro 5300M outperforms Pro Vega 16 by 25% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 16 4809
Pro 5300M 5996
+24.7%

Pro 5300M outperforms Pro Vega 16 by 25% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
−18.6%
70−75
+18.6%
4K38
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−23.1%
30−35
+23.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−23.3%
50−55
+23.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−23.5%
40−45
+23.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−22.7%
50−55
+22.7%
Hitman 3 30−35
−30.3%
40−45
+30.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−26.9%
30−35
+26.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−23.8%
24−27
+23.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−26.9%
30−35
+26.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−26.1%
27−30
+26.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−23.1%
30−35
+23.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−23.3%
50−55
+23.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−23.5%
40−45
+23.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−22.7%
50−55
+22.7%
Hitman 3 30−35
−30.3%
40−45
+30.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−26.9%
30−35
+26.9%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−23.8%
24−27
+23.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−26.9%
30−35
+26.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−26.9%
30−35
+26.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−26.1%
27−30
+26.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−23.1%
30−35
+23.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−23.3%
50−55
+23.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−23.5%
40−45
+23.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−22.7%
50−55
+22.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
−22.2%
30−35
+22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−26.1%
27−30
+26.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−27.8%
21−24
+27.8%
Hitman 3 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−37.5%
30−35
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−25%
24−27
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−31.8%
27−30
+31.8%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Hitman 3 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

This is how Pro Vega 16 and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Pro 5300M is 18.6% faster than Pro Vega 16

4K resolution:

  • Pro 5300M is 18.4% faster than Pro Vega 16

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5300M is 60% faster than the Pro Vega 16.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro 5300M surpassed Pro Vega 16 in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 12.41 15.47
Recency 15 November 2018 13 November 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 65 Watt

The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 16 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon Pro Vega 16
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 158 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.