Radeon Pro 5300M vs Pro Vega 48

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Pro 5300M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro Vega 48
2019
8 GB HBM2
29.26
+89.4%

Pro Vega 48 outperforms Pro 5300M by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking178322
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.493.76
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Navi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date19 March 2019 (5 years ago)13 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$671 $2068

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 48 has 605% better value for money than Pro 5300M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721280
Core clock speed1200 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rate249.6100.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon Pro 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1572 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 48 29.26
+89.4%
Pro 5300M 15.45

Pro Vega 48 outperforms Pro 5300M by 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 48 11299
+89.4%
Pro 5300M 5966

Pro Vega 48 outperforms Pro 5300M by 89% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+77.4%
30−35
−77.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+73.1%
24−27
−73.1%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+77.4%
30−35
−77.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+80.6%
35−40
−80.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+78.6%
40−45
−78.6%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+78.1%
70−75
−78.1%
Hitman 3 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+77.4%
60−65
−77.4%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+86.3%
50−55
−86.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+86%
40−45
−86%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+83.7%
45−50
−83.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+77.4%
30−35
−77.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+73.1%
24−27
−73.1%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+77.4%
30−35
−77.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+80.6%
35−40
−80.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+78.6%
40−45
−78.6%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+78.1%
70−75
−78.1%
Hitman 3 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+77.4%
60−65
−77.4%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+86.3%
50−55
−86.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+86%
40−45
−86%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+83.7%
45−50
−83.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+81.8%
30−35
−81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+77.4%
30−35
−77.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+73.1%
24−27
−73.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+77.4%
30−35
−77.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+80.6%
35−40
−80.6%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+78.1%
70−75
−78.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+77.4%
60−65
−77.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+83.7%
45−50
−83.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+81.8%
30−35
−81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+86%
40−45
−86%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+84.6%
12−14
−84.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+84.2%
18−20
−84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+80%
24−27
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Hitman 3 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+77.4%
30−35
−77.4%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+85.2%
27−30
−85.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+78.6%
27−30
−78.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+80%
24−27
−80%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.26 15.45
Recency 19 March 2019 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Pro Vega 48
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 75 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 163 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.