UHD Graphics Xe G1 vs Radeon Pro 5600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking289not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency34.19no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 12Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 June 2020 (5 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256048
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1030 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate164.8no data
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed770 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2020 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm

Pro 5600M has a 43% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics Xe G1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5600M and UHD Graphics Xe G1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe G1 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 84 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5600M or UHD Graphics Xe G1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.