Radeon Pro 5600M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with Radeon Pro 5600M, including specs and performance data.
Pro 5600M outperforms Tiger Lake-U Graphics G7 by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 516 | 289 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 34.19 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Navi 12 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (5 years ago) | 15 June 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1030 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 164.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 5.274 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 160 |
| L2 Cache | no data | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 770 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 394.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−122%
|
90−95
+122%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−147%
|
70−75
+147%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−104%
|
110−120
+104%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−120%
|
90−95
+120%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−159%
|
85−90
+159%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−75.8%
|
160−170
+75.8%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−122%
|
90−95
+122%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
−75.5%
|
250−260
+75.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
−75%
|
110−120
+75%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−147%
|
70−75
+147%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−104%
|
110−120
+104%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−120%
|
90−95
+120%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
−137%
|
80−85
+137%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
−163%
|
50−55
+163%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−159%
|
85−90
+159%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−175%
|
65−70
+175%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−75.8%
|
160−170
+75.8%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−122%
|
90−95
+122%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
−75%
|
110−120
+75%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−147%
|
70−75
+147%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−120%
|
90−95
+120%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−159%
|
85−90
+159%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−175%
|
65−70
+175%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 55−60
−104%
|
110−120
+104%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
−128%
|
160−170
+128%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
−242%
|
40−45
+242%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
−200%
|
30−33
+200%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
−89.4%
|
190−200
+89.4%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
−178%
|
60−65
+178%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−155%
|
50−55
+155%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−164%
|
55−60
+164%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 20−22
−170%
|
50−55
+170%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
−110%
|
40−45
+110%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−280%
|
18−20
+280%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−240%
|
30−35
+240%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−169%
|
130−140
+169%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
−218%
|
35−40
+218%
|
| Dota 2 | 35−40
−114%
|
75−80
+114%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−189%
|
24−27
+189%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−150%
|
40−45
+150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−167%
|
24−27
+167%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
−167%
|
24−27
+167%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Counter-Strike 2 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5600M is 280% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Pro 5600M performs better in 42 tests (70%)
- there's a draw in 18 tests (30%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.26 | 22.20 |
| Recency | 15 August 2020 | 15 June 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 2 months.
Pro 5600M, on the other hand, has a 140% higher aggregate performance score, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.
Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
