GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5600M

Place in performance ranking	211	279
Place by popularity	not in top-100	46
Architecture	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 10	GN20-S7
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	15 June 2020 (3 years ago)	17 December 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	2048
Boost clock speed	1265 MHz	1477 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	30-45 Watt
Texture fill rate	164.8	189.1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 5600M and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1540 MBps	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	394.2 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
CUDA	no data	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50−55 +19%	42 −19%
1440p	40−45 +29%	31 −29%
4K	35−40 +25%	28 −25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40

−25.6%

49
+25.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +26.3%	35−40 −26.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +0%	42 +0%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +23.8%	60−65 −23.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +31.3%	45−50 −31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −7.7%	42 +7.7%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +6.8%	59 −6.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +28%	50−55 −28%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +25%	60−65 −25%
Hitman 3	70−75 +5.9%	68 −5.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +30.8%	35−40 −30.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +25.8%	30−35 −25.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +35.9%	35−40 −35.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +0%	46 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +26.3%	35−40 −26.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +100%	21 −100%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +23.8%	60−65 −23.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +31.3%	45−50 −31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +30%	30 −30%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +18.9%	53 −18.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +28%	50−55 −28%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +25%	60−65 −25%
Hitman 3	70−75 +28.6%	56 −28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +30.8%	35−40 −30.8%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +33.3%	30−33 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +25.8%	30−35 −25.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +35.9%	35−40 −35.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −7.4%	58 +7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +17.9%	39 −17.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +26.3%	35−40 −26.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +500%	7 −500%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +23.8%	60−65 −23.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +56%	25 −56%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +28.6%	49 −28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +28%	50−55 −28%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +25%	60−65 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +58.8%	34 −58.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +156%	18 −156%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +32.1%	27−30 −32.1%
Hitman 3	40−45 +33.3%	30−33 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +28%	24−27 −28%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +41.2%	16−18 −41.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +30%	20−22 −30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +41.2%	16−18 −41.2%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +31.7%	40−45 −31.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +10.8%	37 −10.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +31.4%	35−40 −31.4%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +32.4%	35−40 −32.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +40%	20−22 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Hitman 3	21−24 +35.3%	16−18 −35.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +36.8%	18−20 −36.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +11.1%	18 −11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +30.8%	24−27 −30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%

This is how Pro 5600M and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

Pro 5600M is 19% faster in 1080p
Pro 5600M is 29% faster in 1440p
Pro 5600M is 25% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 500% faster than the RTX 2050 Mobile.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 26% faster than the Pro 5600M.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro 5600M is ahead in 63 tests (93%)
RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.07	18.57
Recency	15 June 2020	17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	30 Watt